Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What's mine is yours (for a nominal fee) – Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing

Open access
Bucher, Eliane, Fieseler, Christian, Lutz, Christoph·2016·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Arnould, 2015, Mutuality critique and substitute for Belk's “sharing”, Marketing Theory, 16, 75, 10.1177/1470593115572669 · DOI
  2. Bandura, 1994, Self-efficacy, Vol. 4, 71
  3. Bardhi, 2012, Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing, Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 881, 10.1086/666376 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Belk, 2007, Why not share rather than own?, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 126, 10.1177/0002716206298483 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Belk, 2010, Sharing, Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 715, 10.1086/612649 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Belk, 2014, You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online, Journal of Business Research, 67, 1595, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Benkler, 2004, Sharing nicely: on shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production, Yale Law Journal, 114, 273, 10.2307/4135731 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Burgess, 2005, What motivates employees to transfer knowledge outside their work unit?, Journal of Business Communication, 42, 324, 10.1177/0021943605279485 · DOI
  9. Cheek, 1981, Shyness and sociability, Journal of personality and social psychology, 41, 330, 10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chin, 1995, On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution, MIS Quarterly, 19, 237, 10.2307/249690 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Epp, 2008, Family identity: a framework of identity interplay in consumption practices, Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 50, 10.1086/529535 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fornell, 1981, Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382, 10.1177/002224378101800313 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gerbing, 1988, An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186, 10.1177/002224378802500207 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Giesler, 2006, Consumer gift systems, Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 283, 10.1086/506309 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gurven, 2006, The evolution of contingent cooperation, Current Anthropology, 47, 185, 10.1086/499552 · DOI
  16. Hamari, 2015, The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  17. Hogan, 1969, Development of an empathy scale, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307, 10.1037/h0027580 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jenkins, 2014, The messy social lives of objects: inter-personal borrowing and the ambiguity of possession and ownership, Journal of Consumer Behavior, 13, 131, 10.1002/cb.1469 · DOI
  19. John, 2013, The social logics of sharing, The Communication Review, 16, 113, 10.1080/10714421.2013.807119 · DOI
  20. John, 2013, Sharing and web 2.0: the emergence of a keyword, New Media & Society, 15, 167, 10.1177/1461444812450684 · DOI
  21. Kleine, 1995, How is a possession “Me” or “Not Me”? characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment, Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 327, 10.1086/209454 · DOI · Paper page
  22. MacCallum, 1992, Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490, 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ozanne, 2010, Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? an examination of toy library users, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 485, 10.1002/cb.334 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Penner, 1998, Disposition and structural determinants of volunteerism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525, 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.525 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Richins, 1987, Media, materialism, and human happiness, Advances in consumer research, 14, 352
  26. Richins, 1992, A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: scale development and validation, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303, 10.1086/209304 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Sheth, 2011, Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 21, 10.1007/s11747-010-0216-3 · DOI
  28. Wilson, 2002, The anthropology of online communities, Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 449, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085436 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Wittel, 2011, Qualities of sharing and their transformation in the digital age, International Review of Information Ethics, 15, 3, 10.29173/irie218 · DOI
  30. Yuan, 2004, On chi-square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737, 10.1177/0013164404264853 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., & Lutz, C.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
62
Pages
316-326
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002
OpenAlex
W2341670128
Cited by
337
References
14
FWCI
68.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Research Council of Norway (247725/O70)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.