Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eye tracking to investigate cue processing in medical decision-making: A scoping review

Al-Moteri, Modi Owied, Symmons, Mark, Plummer, Virginia, Cooper, Simon·2017·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.022

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Aitken, 2011, Comparison of ‘think aloud’and observation as data collection methods in the study of decision making regarding sedation in intensive care patients, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48, 318, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.014 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arksey, 2005, Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19, 10.1080/1364557032000119616 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Atalay, 2012, Shining in the center: Central gaze cascade effect on product choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 848, 10.1086/665984 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Atkins, 2013, What do surgeons see capturing and synchronizing eye gaze for surgery applications, Surgical Innovation, 20, 241, 10.1177/1553350612449075 · doi:10.1177/1553350612449075
  5. Balatsoukas, 2012, Verbal protocols for assessing the usability of clinical decision support: The retrospective sense making protocol, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 192, 283
  6. Balslev, 2012, Visual expertise in paediatric neurology, European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 16, 161, 10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.07.004 · DOI
  7. Berbaum, 2001, Gaze dwell times on acute trauma injuries missed because of satisfaction of search, Academic Radiology, 8, 304, 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80499-3 · doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80499-3
  8. Blondon, 2014, Use of eye-tracking technology in clinical reasoning: A systematic review, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 210, 90
  9. Bond, 2014, Assessing computerized eye tracking technology for gaining insight into expert interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram: An objective quantitative approach, Journal of Electrocardiology, 47, 895, 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.07.011 · DOI
  10. Brockmole, 2006, Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1177, 10.1080/17470210600665996 · DOI
  11. Browning, 2016, The use and limits of eye-tracking in high-fidelity clinical scenarios: A pilot study, International Emergency Nursing, 25, 43, 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.08.002 · doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2015.08.002
  12. Brunyé, 2014, Eye movements as an index of pathologist visual expertise: A pilot study, Plos One, 9, e103447, 10.1371/journal.pone.0103447 · DOI
  13. Buckingham, 2000, Classifying clinical decision making: A unifying approach, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 981, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01565.x · DOI
  14. Castelhano, 2009, Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception, Journal of Vision, 9, 10.1167/9.3.6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Clark, 2008, Mixed methods approaches in family science research, Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1543, 10.1177/0192513X08318251 · DOI
  16. Cooper, 2009, Radiology image perception and observer performance: How does expertise and clinical information alter interpretation? Stroke detection explored through eye-tracking, Vol. 7263
  17. Croskerry, 2008, Context is everything or how could I have been that stupid?, Healthcare Quarterly, 12, e171, 10.12927/hcq.2009.20945 · DOI
  18. Donald, 2012, Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 56, 173, 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02348.x · DOI
  19. Donovan, 2013, Looking for cancer: Expertise related differences in searching and decision making, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 43, 10.1002/acp.2869 · DOI
  20. Eger, 2007, Cueing retrospective verbal reports in usability testing through eye-movement replay, Vol. 1, 129
  21. Fogarasi, 2012, Improving seizure recognition by visual reinforcement, Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 18, 1, 10.1016/j.npbr.2011.10.002 · DOI
  22. Follet, 2011, New insights into ambient and focal visual fixations using an automatic classification algorithm, Perception, 2, 592, 10.1068/i0414 · DOI
  23. Forsman, 2013, Integrated information visualization to support decision making for use of antibiotics in intensive care: Design and usability evaluation, Informatics for Health and Social Care, 38, 330, 10.3109/17538157.2013.812649 · DOI
  24. Foulsham, 2008, What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition, Journal of Vision, 8, 1, 10.1167/8.2.6 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gegenfurtner, 2011, Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains, Educational Psychology Review, 23, 523, 10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gidlöf, 2013, Using eye tracking to trace a cognitive process: Gaze behaviour during decision making in a natural environment, Journal of Eye Movement Research, 6, 1, 10.16910/jemr.6.1.3 · DOI
  27. Giovinco, 2015, A passing Glance? Differences in eye tracking and gaze patterns between trainees and experts reading plain film bunion radiographs, The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 54, 382, 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.013 · DOI
  28. Glaholt, 2011, Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research, Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4, 125, 10.1037/a0020692 · DOI
  29. Grundgeiger, 2010, Interruption management in the intensive care unit: Predicting resumption times and assessing distributed support, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 317
  30. Hassebrock, 1992, A protocol-based coding scheme for the analysis of medical reasoning, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37, 613, 10.1016/0020-7373(92)90026-H · DOI
  31. Henderson, 2003, Human gaze control during real-world scene perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498, 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Henneman, 2008, Providers do not verify patient identity during computer order entry, Academic Emergency Medicine, 15, 641, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00148.x · DOI
  33. Hermens, 2013, Eye movements in surgery: A literature review, Journal of Eye Movement Research, 6, 1, 10.16910/jemr.6.4.4 · DOI
  34. Hoffman, 2009, A comparison of novice and expert nurses' cue collection during clinical decision-making: Verbal protocol analysis, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 1335, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.001 · DOI
  35. Jungk, 2000, Evaluation of two new ecological interface approaches for the anesthesia workplace, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 16, 243, 10.1023/A:1011462726040 · DOI
  36. Kataoka, 2011, Effects of mental workload on nurses' visual behaviors during infusion pump operation, Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 8, 47, 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2010.00158.x · DOI
  37. Knudsen, 2007, Fundamental components of attention, Annual Reviews Neuroscience, 30, 57, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Koh, 2011, Differences in attentional strategies by novice and experienced operating theatre scrub nurses, Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 17, 233, 10.1037/a0025171 · DOI
  39. Krupinski, 1996, Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms, Academic Radiology, 3, 137, 10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80381-2 · DOI
  40. Krupinski, 2012, Do long radiology workdays affect nodule detection in dynamic CT interpretation?, Journal of the American College of Radiology, 9, 191e198, 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.11.013 · DOI
  41. Krupinski, 1998, Enhancing recognition of lesions in radiographic images using perceptual feedback, Optical Engineering, 37, 813, 10.1117/1.601914 · doi:10.1117/1.601914
  42. Krupinski, 2006, Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides. Implications for medical education and differences with experience, Human Pathology, 37, 1543, 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.024 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kundel, 2007, Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: Gaze-tracking Study1, Radiology, 242, 396, 10.1148/radiol.2422051997 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Kundel, 2008, Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model, Academic Radiology, 15, 881, 10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.023 · DOI
  45. Litchfield, 2010, Viewing another person’s eye movements improves identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray inspection, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 251
  46. Mallett, 2014, Tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal three-dimensional CT Colonography: Visual perception of experienced and inexperienced readers, Radiology, 273, 783, 10.1148/radiol.14132896 · DOI
  47. Manning, 2004, Detection or decision errors? Missed lung from the posteroanterior chest radiograph, British Journal of Radiology, 77, 231, 10.1259/bjr/28883951 · DOI
  48. Manning, 2006, How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules, Radiography, 12, 134, 10.1016/j.radi.2005.02.003 · DOI
  49. Matsumoto, 2011, Where do neurologists look when viewing brain ct images? an eye-tracking study involving stroke cases, Plos One, 6, e28928, 10.1371/journal.pone.0028928 · DOI
  50. Mello-Thoms, 2005, Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading, Academic Radiology, 12, 830, 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.068 · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.068
  51. Nodine, 1987, Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection, Radiographics, 7, 1241, 10.1148/radiographics.7.6.3423330 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Nodine, 2002, Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation, American Journal of Roentgenology, 179, 917, 10.2214/ajr.179.4.1790917 · DOI
  53. O'Neill, 2011, Gaze behavior among experts and trainees during optic disc examination: Does how we look affect what we see?, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 52, 3976, 10.1167/iovs.10-6912 · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6912
  54. Orquin, 2013, Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making, Acta Psychologica, 144, 190, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Pescarini, 2006, Systematic approach to human error in radiology, La Radiologia Medica, 111, 252, 10.1007/s11547-006-0026-3 · doi:10.1007/s11547-006-0026-3
  56. Rayner, 2009, Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457, 10.1080/17470210902816461 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Rubin, 2014, Characterizing search, recognition, and decision in the detection of lung nodules on CT scans: Elucidation with eye tracking, Radiology, 274, 276, 10.1148/radiol.14132918 · DOI
  58. Schotter, 2012, Heuristics and criterion setting during selective encoding in visual decision making: Evidence from eye movements, Visual Cognition, 20, 1110, 10.1080/13506285.2012.735719 · DOI
  59. Shaban, 2015, Theories of clinical judgment and decision-making: A review of the theoretical literature, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 3, 1
  60. Srinath, 2015, Eye movement-based human-computer interaction techniques, International Journal of Innovation Technology Research, 156
  61. Stuijfzand, 2016, Medical students' cognitive load in volumetric image interpretation: Insights from human-computer interaction and eye movements, Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 394, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.015 · DOI
  62. Tien, 2014, Eye tracking for skills assessment and training: a systematic review, Journal of Surgical Research, 191, 169, 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.032 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Tiersma, 2003, Visualising scanning patterns of pathologists in the grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 56, 677, 10.1136/jcp.56.9.677 · doi:10.1136/jcp.56.9.677
  64. Timberg, 2013, Investigation of viewing procedures for interpretation of breast tomosynthesis image volumes: A detection-task study with eye tracking, European Radiology, 23, 997, 10.1007/s00330-012-2675-z · doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2675-z
  65. Unema, 2005, Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration, Visual Cognition, 12, 473, 10.1080/13506280444000409 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Van der Lans, 2011, Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: The binocular-individual threshold (BIT) algorithm, Behavior Research Methods, 43, 239, 10.3758/s13428-010-0031-2 · DOI
  67. Wood, 2013, Exploring the impact of expertise, clinical history, and visual search on electrocardiogram interpretation, Medical Decision Making
  68. Wood, 2013, Visual expertise in detecting and diagnosing skeletal fractures, Skeletal Radiology, 42, 165, 10.1007/s00256-012-1503-5 · DOI
  69. Zheng, 2011, Surgeon's vigilance in the operating room, The American Journal of Surgery, 201, 673, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.01.016 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Al-Moteri, M. O., Symmons, M., Plummer, V., & Cooper, S.
ORCID
Al-Moteri, Modi Owied
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
66
Pages
52-66
ISSN
0747-5632
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.022
Cited by
70
References
6
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.