Cited by 169Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Predicting perpetration of intimate partner cyberstalking: Gender and the Dark Tetrad

Smoker, Melissa, March, Evita·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.012

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smoker, M., & March, E.
Affiliations
Federation University (AU)
Corresponding author
March, Evita
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
72
Pages
390-396
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593617516
Cited by
169
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
32.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
Dark Tetrad, Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism, gender differences, personality traits, cyberstalking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review