Cited by 231Personality Traits and PsychologyBullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

A systematic literature review of the relationship between dark personality traits and antisocial online behaviours

Moor, Lily, Anderson, Joel R.·2019·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.027

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dark triad personality traits are positively associated with online antisocial behaviors, particularly cyberstalking, online trolling, and cyberbullying.

    “Several researches reveal that dark triad’s personality traits seem to be positively associated with the problematic addition to the Internet [32] and with online antisocial behaviors, particularly cyberstalking [9,16], online trolling [10,33,34] and cyberbullying [35].”
  • Psychopathy is the darkest of traits, based on its ability to predict behaviors of 'high severity', namely cyberaggression and technology facilitated sexual violence.

    “In turn, the results of the systematic review of the literature conducted by Moor and Anderson [16] suggest that psychopathy is the darkest of traits, based on its ability to predict behaviors of “high severity”, namely cyberaggression and technology facilitated sexual violence.”
  • Dimensions of the dark triad of personality explain online behaviors.

    “These associations reinforce the behavioral characteristics of these individuals and how they may behave on the Internet, allowing us to suggest that dimensions of the dark triad of personality explain online behaviors [4,9,10,16,20,32,34,35,38,39,63].”
  • Psychopathy is the strongest and most consistent predictor of antisocial online behaviors, followed by Machiavellianism and everyday sadism.

    “A meta-analysis of antisocial online behaviors found that psychopathy was the strongest and most consistent predictor of antisocial online behaviors, followed by Machiavellianism and everyday sadism (Moor & Anderson 2019)”

    From Social Media and Morality. (2024) · cites this paper as Moor & Anderson 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moor, L., & Anderson, J. R.
Affiliations
Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Joel R.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
144
Pages
40-55
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2918479466
Cited by
231
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Catholic University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
dark personality traits, Dark Triad, Dark Tetrad, narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, everyday sadism, trolling, online aggression, cyberbullying, social media addiction, problematic online gaming, internet use disorders, cyberstalking, technology-facilitated sexual violence, sexting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review