Cited by 104Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Considering sadism in the shadow of the Dark Triad traits: A meta-analytic review of the Dark Tetrad

Bonfá-Araujo, Bruno, Lima-Costa, Ariela Raissa, Hauck-Filho, Nelson, Jonason, Peter Karl·2022·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111767

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonfá-Araujo, B., Lima-Costa, A. R., Hauck-Filho, N., & Jonason, P. K.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
197
Pages
111767
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283261802
Cited by
104
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
sadism, Dark Tetrad, Dark Triad, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, antisocial personality traits, online behavior, aggression, moral beliefs, video games, sexual behavior, emotional functioning, social maladjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review