CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Working, scrolling, and worrying: Doomscrolling at work and its implications for work engagement

Hughes, Ian M., Keith, Melissa G., Lee, Juseob, Gray, Cheryl E.·2024·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2023.108130
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2023.108130

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Altheide, 1997, The news media, the problem frame, and the production of fear, The Sociological Quarterly, 38, 647, 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1997.tb00758.x · DOI
  2. Baethge, 2021, Does work engagement physiologically deplete? Results from a daily diary study, Work & Stress, 35, 283, 10.1080/02678373.2020.1857466 · DOI
  3. Barber, 2013, Are better sleepers more engaged workers? A self-regulatory approach to sleep hygiene and work engagement, Stress and Health, 29, 307, 10.1002/smi.2468 · DOI
  4. Baumeister, 1998, Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252, 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bowden-Green, 2021, Understanding neuroticism and social media: A systematic review, Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110344 · DOI
  6. Bowling, 2013, The role of personality in occupational stress: A review and future research agenda, 692
  7. Buchanan, 2021, Brief exposure to social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: Doom-scrolling has negative emotional consequences, but kindness-scrolling does not, PLoS One, 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0257728 · DOI
  8. Carpenter, 2017, Are counterproductive work behavior and withdrawal empirically distinct? A meta-analytic investigation, Journal of Management, 43, 834, 10.1177/0149206314544743 · DOI
  9. Carver, 1990, Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view, Psychological Review, 97, 19, 10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cheung, 2002, Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cooper-Thomas, 2014, The relative importance of proactive behaviors and outcomes for predicting newcomer learning, well-being, and work engagement, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84, 318, 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.02.007 · DOI
  12. Dalal, 2020, Within-person job performance variability over short timeframes: Theory, empirical research, and practice, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 421, 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045350 · DOI
  13. Donnellan, 2006, The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-Effective measures of the Big five factors of personality, Psychological Assessment, 18, 192, 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Enders, 2007, Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue, Psychological Methods, 12, 121, 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fisher, 2016, Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 3, 10.1037/a0039139 · DOI
  16. Fisher, 2012, Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 865, 10.1002/job.1803 · DOI
  17. Forgays, 2014, Texting everywhere for everything: Gender and age differences in cell phone etiquette and use, Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 314, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.053 · DOI
  18. Gallagher, 1990, Extraversion, neuroticism and appraisal of stressful academic events, Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1053, 10.1016/0191-8869(90)90133-C · DOI
  19. Geldhof, 2014, Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, Psychological Methods, 19, 72, 10.1037/a0032138 · DOI
  20. Gunthert, 1999, The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1087, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1087 · DOI
  21. Halbesleben, 2014, Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory, Journal of Management, 40, 1334, 10.1177/0149206314527130 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Han, 2022, A meta-analysis integrating 20 years of workplace incivility research: Antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43, 497, 10.1002/job.2568 · DOI
  23. Hayes, 2020, Conditional process analysis: Concepts, computation, and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms, American Behavioral Scientist, 64, 19, 10.1177/0002764219859633 · DOI
  24. Hobfoll, 1989, Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress, American Psychologist, 513, 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hobfoll, 2018, Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103, 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kharde, 2016, Sentiment analysis of twitter data: A survey of techniques, International Journal of Computer Application, 139, 5, 10.5120/ijca2016908625 · DOI
  27. Knight, 2017, Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 792, 10.1002/job.2167 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lai, 2016, The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 220, 10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lanaj, 2023, The importance of leader recovery for leader identity and behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 10.1037/apl0001092 · DOI
  30. LeBow, 2022, Twitter to lose more than 30 million users in the next two years, eMarketer
  31. Lee, 2023, Emotional exhaustion across the workday: Person-level and day-level predictors of workday emotional exhaustion growth curves, Journal of Applied Psychology, 10.1037/apl0001095 · DOI
  32. Liu, 2009, Daily work stress and alcohol use: Testing the cross-level moderation effects of neuroticism and job involvement, Personnel Psychology, 62, 575, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01149.x · DOI
  33. Luo, 2022, The stressful personality: A meta-analytical review of the relation between personality and stress, Vol. 10888683221104002
  34. MacGowan, 2022, Does psychological detachment benefit job seekers? A two study weekly investigation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 107, 2319, 10.1037/apl0000967 · DOI
  35. Matthews, 2022, Normalizing the use of single-item measures: Validation of the single-item compendium for organizational psychology, Journal of Business and Psychology, 37, 639, 10.1007/s10869-022-09813-3 · DOI
  36. McCrae, 1987, Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81, 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Moe, 2021, Between ritual and information: Three phases of Norwegian news audiences' sense-making of the election of Donald Trump, Journalism, 22, 2764, 10.1177/1464884919883103 · DOI
  38. Neuber, 2022, How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: A meta-analysis, European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 31, 292, 10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953989 · DOI
  39. Nguyen, 2020, Doomscrolling: Why we just can't look away, The Wall Street Journal
  40. Nixon, 2020, The business of news in the attention economy: Audience labor and MediaNews Group's efforts to capitalize on news consumption, Journalism, 21, 73, 10.1177/1464884917719145 · DOI
  41. Ozyilmaz, 2020, Hope and human capital enhance job engagement to improve workplace outcomes, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93, 187, 10.1111/joop.12289 · DOI
  42. Ployhart, 2010, Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change, Journal of Management, 36, 94, 10.1177/0149206309352110 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Rice, 2022, The impact of hindrance appraisals on leader bottom-line mentality: Implications for leadership drawbacks and the amplification effect of leader neuroticism, International Journal of Stress Management, 29, 229, 10.1037/str0000253 · DOI
  44. Rosseel, 2012, lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more Version 0.5-12 (BETA), Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1, 10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Schaufeli, 2002, The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71, 10.1023/A:1015630930326 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Schaufeli, 2019, An ultra-short measure for work engagement, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 577, 10.1027/1015-5759/a000430 · DOI
  47. Schaufeli, 2008, Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being?, Applied Psychology, 57, 173, 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00285.x · DOI · Paper page
  48. Sharma, 2022, The dark at the end of the tunnel: Doomscrolling on social media newsfeeds, Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 3
  49. Smith, 2022, The importance of appraisal in stressor-well-being relationships and the examination of personality traits as boundary conditions, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37, 425, 10.1108/JMP-11-2019-0649 · DOI
  50. Van Hootegem, 2022, Does occupational self-efficacy mediate the relationships between job insecurity and work-related learning? A latent growth modelling approach, Work & Stress, 36, 229, 10.1080/02678373.2021.1891585 · DOI
  51. Wallace, 2017, How do you feel about your friends? Understanding situational envy in online social networks, Information & Management, 54, 669, 10.1016/j.im.2016.12.010 · DOI
  52. White, 2022, An urgent call for I-O psychologists to produce timelier technology research, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15, 441, 10.1017/iop.2022.26 · DOI
  53. Ytre-Arne, 2021, Doomscrolling, monitoring and avoiding: News use in COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, Journalism Studies, 22, 1739, 10.1080/1461670X.2021.1952475 · DOI
  54. Zhang, 2021, Exploring public sentiment on enforced remote work during COVID-19, Journal of Applied Psychology, 106, 797, 10.1037/apl0000933 · DOI
  55. Zhou, 2019, The spillover effects of coworker, supervisor, and outsider workplace incivility on work-to-family conflict: A weekly diary design, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40, 1000, 10.1002/job.2401 · DOI
  56. Zhou, 2014, Effect of workplace incivility on end-of-work negative affect: Examining individual and organizational moderators in a daily diary study, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 117, 10.1037/a0038167 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, I. M., Keith, M. G., Lee, J., & Gray, C. E.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
153
Pages
108130
ISSN
0747-5632
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2023.108130
Cited by
18
References
12
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review