Cited by 17Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesChild Welfare and AdoptionHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Suicidal because I don't feel connected or vice versa? A longitudinal study of suicidal ideation and connectedness among child welfare youth

Fulginiti, Anthony, He, Amy S., Negriff, Sonya·2018·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Suicide is a major public health problem among youth involved with the child welfare system. Although social connectedness rests at the core of many prevention approaches, we know little about this relationship over time in this vulnerable population. This study tested the hypotheses that inverse relationships would exist between connectedness in three social domains (i.e., caregiver, peers, and school) and suicidal ideation over time. The current study used baseline and 18-month follow-up data from 995 youth who participated in the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW II)-a nationally representative study of children and families investigated by a child welfare agency conducted from 2008 to 2011. A cross-lagged path model was used for the analysis. There were significant main effects of suicidal ideation at Time 1 on peer connectedness (β= -.17, p < .01) and caregiver connectedness (β= -.12, p < .05) at Time 2, but not on school connectedness (β= -.05, ns). There was no main effect of any of the connectedness variables at Time 1 on suicidal ideation at Time 2. Screening for suicidal ideation is important for managing immediate risk but our findings suggest that such ideation also foreshadows disconnectedness from their primary caregiver and peers in the future. These findings demonstrate that there is clinical value in engaging child-welfare-involved youth and their social systems about how their suicide-related experiences may affect vital social ties. Therefore, there may be merit to designing and exploring the effects of pilot programming focused on mitigating social distancing that suicide-related experiences engender.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.10.010

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fulginiti, A., He, A. S., & Negriff, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Fulginiti, Anthony
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
86
Pages
278-289
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898637066
Cited by
17
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicidal ideation, social connectedness, peer connection, school connectedness, suicide prevention, social distancing, child welfare system
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Welfare, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Peer Group, Schools, United States, Social Participation, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review