Cited by 296Child Welfare and AdoptionHomelessness and Social IssuesFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Understanding social network disruption: The case of youth in foster care

Perry, Brea L.·2006·Social Problems

Abstract

Relatively little existing research has examined variation in psychological distress outcomes for individuals who suddenly lose access to multiple established network ties. Adolescents placed in foster care provide a unique opportunity to examine the effects of different levels of network disruption. Some types of foster care placement provide stability and continuity while others are characterized by persistent network turnover. Using data from telephone surveys with adolescents in foster care in a midwestern state, the author compares the primary relationships of youth in foster care and in the general population, and explores relationships between psychological distress, levels of network disruption, strength of ties within three domains (the biological family, foster care, and peer networks), and other network variables. The author finds that variations in psychological distress following network disruption may be explained, in part, by the structure and strength of the resulting network. Also, increasing levels of network disruption weaken networks and ongoing or repeated instances of disruption may be particularly problematic. Strong and supportive ties with new network members may replace weak or absent ties within old network domains as a protective factor for psychological outcomes. The author advocates grounding social problems research in a solid, theoretical foundation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/sp.2006.53.3.371

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perry, B. L.
Affiliations
Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Perry, Brea L.
Venue
Social Problems
Published
2006-08
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
371-391
ISSN
  • 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8533
OpenAlex
W1997461165
Cited by
296
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Problems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
foster care, adolescents, psychological distress, network ties, tie strength, biological family, peer networks, protective factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review