Cited by 34Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Childhood adversity, mental health, and the perpetration of physical violence in the adult intimate relationships of women prisoners: A life course approach

Jones, Melissa S., Burge, Stephanie W., Sharp, Susan F., McLeod, David A.·2020·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Background Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are common, with nearly two-thirds of adult samples reporting exposure to at least one and one-quarter reporting exposure to three or more distinct types of ACEs. ACEs have been linked to various negative outcomes across the life course, including mental health problems, and the perpetration of physical violence in intimate relationships. However, little is known about the relationships between ACEs, PTSD symptomology, and use of physical violence against an adult intimate partner among incarcerated women.Objective The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationships between ACEs, PTSD symptoms, and the perpetration of the physical violence in the adult intimate relationships of women prisoners.Methods Using data from the 2014 Oklahoma Study of Incarcerated Mothers and Their Children (N = 349) and structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques, we investigate the potential mediating effect of PTSD symptoms in the relationship between ACEs and perpetrating violence against an intimate partner.Results Our findings indicate that PTSD symptomology fully mediates the relationship between ACEs and the perpetration of physical violence against an adult intimate partner, indicating that PTSD experiences may be central to understanding women's pathways toward violence.Conclusions Women prisoners who were exposed to ACEs during childhood were at a particularly elevated risk of developing PTSD symptomology and perpetrating physical violence against an adult intimate partner. Based on the current study's findings, treatment programs that address these complex relationships between ACEs, particularly focusing on the central role of mental health in these processes, are needed for incarcerated women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104237

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, M. S., Burge, S. W., Sharp, S. F., & McLeod, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Melissa S.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
101
Pages
104237
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3001637016
Cited by
34
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, intimate partner violence, women prisoners, posttraumatic stress symptoms, incarcerated mothers, life course, mediation, mental health
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Physical Abuse, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Latent Class Analysis, Mediation Analysis, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Middle Aged, Oklahoma, Prisoners, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review