Cited by 410Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyChild Abuse and TraumaPersonality Traits and Psychology

Childhood adversity and personality disorders: Results from a nationally representative population-based study

Afifi, Tracie O., Mather, Amber, Boman, Jonathon, Fleisher, William, Enns, Murray W., MacMillan, Harriet, Sareen, Jitender·2011·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Background Although, a large population-based literature exists on the relationship between childhood adversity and Axis I mental disorders, research on the link between childhood adversity and Axis II personality disorders (PDs) relies mainly on clinical samples. The purpose of the current study was to examine the relationship between a range of childhood adversities and PDs in a nationally representative sample while adjusting for Axis I mental disorders.Methods Data were from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC; n=34,653; data collection 2004-2005); a nationally representative sample of the United States population aged 20 years and older.Results The results indicated that many types of childhood adversity were highly prevalent among individuals with PDs in the general population and childhood adversity was most consistently associated with schizotypal, antisocial, borderline, and narcissistic PDs. The most robust childhood adversity findings were for child abuse and neglect with cluster A and cluster B PDs after adjusting for all other types of childhood adversity, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, other PD clusters, and sociodemographic variables (Odd Ratios ranging from 1.22 to 1.63). In these models, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders also remained significantly associated with PD clusters (Odds Ratios ranging from 1.26 to 2.38).Conclusions Further research is necessary to understand whether such exposure has a causal role in the association with PDs. In addition to preventing child maltreatment, it is important to determine ways to prevent impairment among those exposed to adversity, as this may reduce the development of PDs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.11.008

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Childhood adversities most consistently predicted personality disorders from clusters A and B-most notably schizotypal, antisocial, borderline, and narcissistic profiles.

    “Other studies confirmed that childhood adversities most consistently predicted personality disorders from clusters A and B—most notably schizotypal, antisocial, borderline, and narcissistic profiles [12].”
  • Cumulative maltreatment increases the risk of Cluster A and B personality disorders.

    “These findings are in line with previous work indicating that cumulative maltreatment increases the risk of Cluster A and B personality disorders [11, 12], and that specific forms of neglect and abuse contribute to the development of maladaptive personality traits [10].”
  • An increase in PD diagnoses from adolescence to adulthood in this sample may be explained by the fact that many adolescents in residential care and juvenile-justice institutions have experienced severe childhood adversities (e.g., child abuse and neglect), which are shown to significantly contribute to the development of PDs.

    “An increase in PD diagnoses from adolescence to adulthood in this sample, may, thus, be explained by the fact that many adolescents in residential care and juvenile-justice institutions have experienced severe childhood adversities (e.g., child abuse and neglect), which are shown to significantly contribute to the development of PDs (59, 60).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Afifi, T. O., Mather, A., Boman, J., Fleisher, W., Enns, M. W., MacMillan, H., & Sareen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Afifi, Tracie O.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
814-822
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121138841
Cited by
410
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
childhood adversity, personality disorders, child abuse, child neglect, schizotypal personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, Cluster A personality disorders, cluster B personality disorders, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, child abuse prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Canada, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Personality Disorders, Risk Factors, Sampling Studies, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Stress, Psychological, Mood Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review