The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations that attenuate monoclonal and serum antibody neutralization
Open accessAbstract
Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein are a goal of COVID-19 vaccines and have received emergency use authorization as therapeutics. However, viral escape mutants could compromise efficacy. To define immune-selected mutations in the S protein, we exposed a VSV-eGFP-SARS-CoV-2-S chimeric virus, in which the VSV glycoprotein is replaced with the S protein, to 19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and generated 50 different escape mutants. Each mAb had a unique resistance profile, although many shared residues within an epitope of the RBD. Some variants (e.g., S477N) were resistant to neutralization by multiple mAbs, whereas others (e.g., E484K) escaped neutralization by convalescent sera. Additionally, sequential selection identified mutants that escape neutralization by antibody cocktails. Comparing these antibody-mediated mutations with sequence variation in circulating SARS-CoV-2 revealed substitutions that may attenuate neutralizing immune responses in some humans and thus warrant further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“F490S mutation helps the Lambda variant to escape convalescent sera and neutralizing antibodies from the CoronaVac vaccine and also reduced in vitro susceptibility to neutralization [54].”
From Waves and variants of SARS-CoV-2: understanding the causes and effect of the COVID-19 catastrophe (2022) · cites this paper as [54]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“several were previously shown to modulate ACE2 binding and/or antibody evasion”
From The Omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization: Implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2021
In the citing paper
“Our results establishing the E484K substitution as a vulnerability for multiple neutralizing mAbs are consistent with deep mutational scanning or VSV-SARS-CoV-2-based neutralization escape screening campaigns31,33,34.”
From Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants to neutralization by monoclonal and serum-derived polyclonal antibodies (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“E484K has resulted in 3-fold to 10-fold reduced susceptibility to about 30% and >10-fold reduced susceptibility to about 10% of convalescent plasma samples”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [160]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., Schroeder, S., Krüger, N., Herrler, T., Erichsen, S., Schiergens, T. S., Herrler, G., Wu, N.-H., Nitsche, A., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052 · Cited by 20,286 · cited 1×
“Processing of S by host cell proteases, typically TMPRSS2, TMPRSS4, or endosomal cathepsins, facilitates the S2-dependent fusion of viral and host-cell membranes (Hoffmann et al., 2020; Zang et al., 2020).”
BackgroundA new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China
Wu, F., Zhao, S., Yu, B., Chen, Y.-M., Wang, W., Song, Z.-G., Hu, Y., Tao, Z.-W., Tian, J.-H., Pei, Y.-Y., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3 · Cited by 11,688
Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation
Wrapp, D., Wang, N., Corbett, K. S., Goldsmith, J. A., Hsieh, C.-L., Abiona, O., Graham, B. S., & McLellan, J. S. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2507 · Cited by 8,897
Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor
Lan, J., Ge, J., Yu, J., Shan, S., Zhou, H., Fan, S., Zhang, Q., Shi, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, L., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5 · Cited by 5,983 · cited 1×
“The impact of SARS-CoV-2 adaptation for infection of other hosts including mice (Dinnon et al., 2020; Gu et al., 2020), mink (Oude Munnink et al., 2021), and domesticated animals (Halfmann et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2020) could also contribute to selection of new variants.”
BackgroundStructural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2
Shang, J., Ye, G., Shi, K., Wan, Y., Luo, C., Aihara, H., Geng, Q., Auerbach, A., & Li, F. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y · Cited by 3,661 · cited 1×
“Residue F486 is located on the top of the hACE2 contact loop of RBD, and the presence of a large hydrophobic residue facilitates efficient receptor engagement (Lan et al., 2020; Shang et al., 2020).”
BackgroundLetko, M., Marzi, A., & Munster, V. (2020) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y · Cited by 3,109 · cited 2×
“During viral entry into cells, the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S1 engages the primary receptor, human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) (Letko et al., 2020).”
BackgroundTegally, H., Wilkinson, E., Giovanetti, M., Iranzadeh, A., Fonseca, V., Giandhari, J., Doolabh, D., Pillay, S., San, E. J., Msomi, N., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.21.20248640 · Cited by 2,535 · cited 1×
“a combination of at least two neutralizing antibodies (Baum et al., 2020; Du et al., 2020; 316 Greaney et al., 2020; Group et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Weisblum et al., 2020).”
BackgroundDetection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa
Tegally, H., Wilkinson, E., Giovanetti, M., Iranzadeh, A., Fonseca, V., Giandhari, J., Doolabh, D., Pillay, S., San, E. J., Msomi, N., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9 · Cited by 2,510
Monteil, V., Kwon, H., Prado, P., Hagelkrüys, A., Wimmer, R. A., Stahl, M., Leopoldi, A., Garreta, E., Hurtado del Pozo, C., Prosper, F., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.004 · Cited by 2,122
Starr, T. N., Greaney, A. J., Hilton, S. K., Ellis, D., Crawford, K. H. D., Dingens, A. S., Navarro, M. J., Bowen, J. E., Tortorici, M. A., Walls, A. C., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.012 · Cited by 1,956
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 739
Lamb, K. D., Hughes, J., Lytras, S., Young, F., Koci, O., Herzig, J. C., Lovell, S. C., Grove, J., Yuan, K., & Robertson, D. L. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69569-9 · Cited by 20
“Interestingly, A, D, G and K substitutions at position 484 all confer resistance to human convalescent sera 14,24 .”
Novel Highly Divergent SARS-CoV-2 Lineage With the Spike Substitutions L249S and E484K
Laiton‐Donato, K., Usme-Ciro, J. A., Franco-Muñoz, C., Álvarez-Díaz, D. A., Ruiz-Moreno, H. A., Reales-González, J., Prada-Cardozo, D., Corchuelo, S., Herrera-Sepúlveda, M. T., Naizaque, J., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.697605 · Cited by 7
“This amino acid change located at the RBD of the spike protein has been found to have a negative effect on neutralization by monoclonal antibodies (10), as well as vaccine-induced (11) and polyclonal antibodies resulting from natural infection with circulating lineages (12).”
BackgroundSokullu, E., Pinard, M., Gauthier, M., & Coulombe, B. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2021.1909566 · Cited by 7
“The mutations in S protein and their impact on viral infectivity and antigenicity have been also studied [36,37].”
BackgroundTrobajo‐Sanmartín, C., Miqueleiz, A., Portillo, M. E., Fernández-Huerta, M., Navascués, A., Sara, P. S., Moreno, P. L., Ordoñez, G. R., Castilla, J., & Ezpeleta, C. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01736-21 · Cited by 7
“antibodies and may be associated with reduced efficacy of vaccines (2, 3, 5, 6).”
BackgroundKirkham, A. M., Monaghan, M., Bailey, A. J.-M., Shorr, R., Lalu, M. M., Fergusson, D. A., & Allan, D. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01803-5 · Cited by 7
“Furthermore, both these therapies are not approved for use in pediatric populations [70, 71], are resource intensive [75, 76], and may be susceptible to escape mutants [77, 78].”
BackgroundMutnal, M. B., Johnson, S., Mohamed, N., Abddelgader, R., Morales, L., Volz, M., Walker, K., Arroliga, A. C., & Rao, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.27373 · Cited by 7
Cevasco, K. E., Roess, A., North, H. M., Zeitoun, S. A., Wofford, R. N., Matulis, G. A., Gregory, A. F., Hassan, M. H., Abdo, A. D., & von Fricken, M. E. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12035-6 · Cited by 7
“At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, national and international health agencies and governments relied solely on non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) due to the absence of effective therapeutics and vaccines at the time, and continued to do so given the rapid emergence of several variants to which current therape…”
BackgroundEpiCurator: an immunoinformatic workflow to predict and prioritize SARS-CoV-2 epitopes
Ferreira, C. D. S., Martins, Y., Souza, R. C., & de Vasconcelos, A. T. R. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.12548 · Cited by 7
Shrivastava, S., Mhaske, S. T., Modak, M. S., Virkar, R., Pisal, S. S., Mishra, A. C., & Arankalle, V. A. (2022) · Archives of Virology · doi:10.1007/s00705-021-05320-7 · Cited by 7
“With the T478I mutation, moderate resistance to neutralization by two monoclonal antibodies and convalescent sera from two COVID-19 patients has been documented [26].”
BackgroundCharacteristic analysis of Omicron‐included SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern
Yang, H., Liu, P., Zhang, Y., Du, T., Zhou, Y., Lu, S., & Peng, X. (2022) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.129 · Cited by 6
Zhang, M., Gong, Y., & Jiao, S. (2022) · Future Virology · doi:10.2217/fvl-2021-0100 · Cited by 7
Kashani, N. R., Azadbakht, J., Ehteram, H., Kashani, H. H., Moghadam, H. R., Ahmad, E., Nikzad, H., & Hosseini, E. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.770775 · Cited by 7
King, D. J., Freimanis, G., Neil, C., Shaw, A. E., Tuthill, T. J., Laing, E., King, D. P., & Lasecka‐Dykes, L. (2022) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v14081820 · Cited by 7
Ekström, N., Haveri, A., Solastie, A., Virta, C., Österlund, P., Nohynek, H., Nieminen, T. A., Ivaska, L., Tähtinen, P. A., Lempainen, J., et al. (2022) · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac625 · Cited by 8
“In subjects receiving 1 dose of Vaxzevria following infection, we found similar or slightly higher S-IgG concentrations compared with subjects who received 2 doses of vaccine (Comirnaty; P = .237 and 0.04, for RBD- and SFL-IgG, respectively) (Table 1; Supplementary Figure 2).”
BackgroundInfluentialNanomaterials to combat SARS-CoV-2: Strategies to prevent, diagnose and treat COVID-19
Valenzuela-Fernández, A., Cabrera-Rodríguez, R., Ciuffreda, L., Pérez-Yanes, S., Estévez‐Herrera, J., González‐Montelongo, R., Alcoba-Flórez, J., Trujillo‐González, R., de Artola, D. G.-M., Gil-Campesino, H., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.1052436 · Cited by 8
Cianfarini, C. L., Hassler, L., Wysocki, J. A., Hassan, A., Nicolaescu, V. I., Elli, D., Gula, H., Ibrahim, A. M., Randall, G. C., Henkin, J., et al. (2024) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells13030203 · Cited by 7
He, X., Ding, L., Cao, K., Peng, H., Gu, C., Li, Y., Li, D., Dong, L., Hong, X., Wang, X., et al. (2021) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2021.1957400 · Cited by 7
“Thus, K562-S can be easily further engineered by the introduction of S genes from SARS-CoV-2 variants [46], SARS-CoV and/or MERS-CoV to make it a universal coronavirus vaccine, or immune-modulatory molecules to increase the engagement of immune cells or combining both.”
BackgroundBiswas, S., Mahmud, S., Mita, M. A., Afrose, S., Hasan, M. R., Paul, G. K., Shimu, M. S. S., Uddin, M. S., Zaman, S., Park, M. N., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.825245 · Cited by 6
Ham, R. E., Smothers, A. R., Che, R., Sell, K. J., Peng, C. A., & Dean, D. (2022) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00797-22 · Cited by 7
Fenwick, C. W., Turelli, P., Pellaton, C., Farina, A., Campos, J., Raclot, C., Pojer, F., Cagno, V., Pantaleo, G., & Trono, D. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.04.08.21255150 · Cited by 7
“It advantageously compares with viral pseudotypes-based systems, where each S 232 protein mutant requires production of a new batch of virions that have to be tested in separate assays, 233 with their infectivity potentially affected by the mutations and neutralization titers influenced by the 234 levels of ACE2 on th…”
BackgroundBroadly potent spike-specific human monoclonal antibodies inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sub-lineages
Walker, M. R., Underwood, A., Björnsson, K. H., Raghavan, S. S. R., Bassi, M. R., Binderup, A., Pham, L. V., Ramirez, S., Pinholt, M., Dagil, R., et al. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06951-7 · Cited by 6
Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies
Santamaria-Castro, I., Leiva-Rebollo, R., Marín‐Wong, S., Jiménez-Guardeño, J. M., & Ortega‐Prieto, A. M. (2025) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00260-24 · Cited by 7
Functional and structural basis of Omicron BA.3.2.1 spike
Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Chen, Z., Zou, J., Zhang, K., Ren, P., Shi, P., Liang, B., & Xie, X. (2026) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117812 · Cited by 6
Lina, B. (2021) · Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine · doi:10.1016/j.banm.2021.11.002 · Cited by 6
Mwangi, P. N., Okendo, J., Mogotsi, M. T., Ogunbayo, A. E., Adelabu, O. A., Sondlane, H., Maotoana, M. G., Mahomed, L., Morobadi, M. D., Vawda, S., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Virology · doi:10.3389/fviro.2022.935131 · Cited by 6
Studying SARS-CoV-2 interactions using phage-displayed receptor binding domain as a model protein
Pérez-Massón, B., Quintana-Perez, Y., Tundidor, Y., Pérez‐Martínez, D., Castro-Martínez, C., Pupo-Meriño, M., Orosa-Vázquez, I., Relova-Hernández, E., Villegas, R., Guirola, O., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50450-4 · Cited by 6
“Position 484 had been already highlighted as a prominent site of appearance of escape mutations which pre-clude recognition and/or neutralization by mAbs and antisera from both convalescent patients and vaccinated individuals 25–27 , 53 .”
Muhseen, Z. T., Kadhim, S., Yahiya, Y. I., Alatawi, E. A., Alkhayl, F. F. A., & Almatroudi, A. (2021) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology10121310 · Cited by 6
“37, or the Lambda/λ variant, reported in Peru with mutations L452Q and F490S in the RBD was suspected to be associated with decreased antibody neutralization susceptibility, particularly due to the F490S mutation in the RBD [22,23].”
BackgroundHamdy, M. E., El‐Deeb, A. H., Hagag, N. M., Shahein, M. A., Alaidi, O., & Hussein, H. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.875123 · Cited by 6
Sarma, K., Bali, N. K., Sarmah, N., & Borkakoty, B. (2022) · COVID · doi:10.3390/covid2120124 · Cited by 6
Development of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine: Challenges and Prospects
Mahboob, T., Ismail, A. A., Shah, M. R., Rahmatullah, M., Paul, A. K., Pereira, M. D. L., Wiart, C., Wilairatana, P., Rajagopal, M. S., Dolma, K. G., et al. (2023) · Diseases · doi:10.3390/diseases11020064 · Cited by 6
Mutational Analysis of Circulating Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Lineages in the Al-Baha Region of Saudi Arabia
Almalki, S. S. R., Izhari, M. A., Alyahyawi, H. E., Alatawi, S. K., Klufah, F., Ahmed, W. A. M., & Alharbi, R. (2023) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s419859 · Cited by 6
“L452R substitution first identified in Denmark was associated with enhanced infectivity and poor antibody neutralization.(70) Substitution E484Q enhanced the ACE2 receptor affinity.”
BackgroundGuruprasad, L., Naresh, G. K. R. S., & Boggarapu, G. (2023) · Current Research in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.crstbi.2023.100107 · Cited by 7
“…(Huai Luo et al., 2022; W. B. Wang et al., 2021), evade immune-protection resulting from the administration of vaccines (Jangra et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Augusto et al., 2022), bind to the host with increased affinity (Ramanathan et al., 2021) or become less infective than previous…”
Guilbaud, R., Yusti, A.-M. F., Leducq, V., Zafilaza, K., Bridier‐Nahmias, A., Todesco, È., Soulié, C., Fauchois, A., Hingrat, Q. L., Kramer, L. D., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiad499 · Cited by 7
Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Spike Protein Mutants Binding with Human β Defensin Type 2
Zhang, L., & Li, J. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c05460 · Cited by 6
Passive Immunity Should and Will Work for COVID-19 for Some Patients
Cimolai, N. (2021) · Clinical Hematology International · doi:10.2991/chi.k.210328.001 · Cited by 7
Can proteomics-based approaches further help COVID-19 prevention and therapy?
Kumar, V. (2021) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1080/14789450.2021.1924684 · Cited by 6
“tralizing Abs or may be less efficiently cleared [4,5].”
BackgroundSynthetic proteins for COVID-19 diagnostics
Schein, C. H., Levine, C. B., McLellan, S., Negi, S. S., Braun, W. A., Dreskin, S. C., Anaya, E. S., & Schmidt, J. G. (2021) · Peptides · doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2021.170583 · Cited by 6
Molecular and Epidemiological Characterization of Emerging Immune-Escape Variants of SARS-CoV-2
Miyakawa, K., Jeremiah, S. S., Yamaoka, Y., Koyama, T., Tokumasu, R., Kudo, M., Kato, H., & Ryo, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.811004 · Cited by 6
Evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in India
Potdar, V. A., & Cherian, S. (2022) · Medical Journal Armed Forces India · doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.05.006 · Cited by 7
SARS-CoV-2 Spike receptor-binding domain with a G485R mutation in complex with human ACE2Preprint
Weekley, C. M., Purcell, D. F. J., & Parker, M. W. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.16.434488 · Cited by 6
“Its neighbouring residue E484 is of great interest to the scientific community with the mutation E484K contributing to antigenic escape (Greaney et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021).”
BackgroundDevelopment of highly potent non-covalent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 3CLproPreprint
Hou, N., Shuai, L., Zhang, L., Xie, X., Tang, K., Zhu, Y., Yin, Y., Zhang, W., Tan, Q., Zhong, G., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.08.10.503531 · Cited by 6
“Several monoclonal antibodies, which target the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 to block viral entry into human cells, have received an Emergency Use Authorization for treating COVID-19 {Corti:2021fp}, however, viral variants with mutations in the spike protein have been found to compromise the efficacy of these antibodie…”
BackgroundZhang, L., Cui, Z., Li, Q., Yu, Y., Wu, J., Nie, J., Ding, R., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., et al. (2021) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-492659/v1 · Cited by 5
Systematic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants’ impact on B and T cell epitopes
Khalaf, R. A., Bernasconi, A., & Pinoli, P. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307873 · Cited by 5
“Liu et al. [47] found that substitutions at E484 of the Spike were associated with relative resistance to neutralization by several antibodies.”
BackgroundFeng, S., Reid, G., Clark, N. M., Harrington, A., Uprichard, S. L., & Baker, S. C. (2024) · Virology Journal · doi:10.1186/s12985-024-02378-y · Cited by 5
“Interestingly, P29 had a treatment history of I n v i t r o c o n fi r m e d s i t e s c o n f e r a r e d u c t i o n i n s u s - c e p t i b i l i t y t o b e b t e l o v i m a b [ 33 , 34 ] L a t e r O m i c r o n B Q .”
BackgroundKumar, A., Ladha, A., Choudhury, A., Ikbal, A. M. A., Bhattacharjee, B., Das, T., Gupta, G., Sharma, C., Sarbajna, A., Mandal, S. C., et al. (2022) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1080/14760584.2022.2081156 · Cited by 5
“occur at the 477th position, namely, S477G, S477N, and S477R, which are important for escaping from neutralization by mAbs [48].”
BackgroundRajpal, V. R., Sharma, S., Kumar, A., Vaishnavi, S., Singh, A., Sehgal, D., Tiwari, M., Goel, S., & Raina, S. N. (2022) · Future Virology · doi:10.2217/fvl-2021-0267 · Cited by 5
“Further, multiple spike substitutions at 477 (S477G, S477N and S477R) and 484 positions (E484A, E484D and E484K) have characteristically shown resistance toward convalescent sera [28,31,35].”
BackgroundWang, J.-G., Muhammad, S. F., Aman, S., Khan, A., Munir, S., Khan, M., Mohammad, A., Waheed, Y., Munir, M., Guo, L., et al. (2022) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2022.2123399 · Cited by 5
“37 variant discovered in Pero, regarded as the ‘variant of interest’ had mutations (L452Q and F490S in the RBD) assumed to be related with decreased antibody neutralizing susceptibility, predominantly due to the F490S mutation in the RBD (Liu et al., 2021; Wink et al., 2021).”
BackgroundSchöfbänker, M., Neddermeyer, R., Günther, T., Mueller, M., Romberg, M.-L., Classen, N., Hennies, M. T., Hrincius, E. R., Ludwig, S., Kühn, J., et al. (2023) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines11121832 · Cited by 5
Robinson‐McCarthy, L. R., Zirckel, K. E., Simmons, H. C., Sage, V. L., & McCarthy, K. R. (2025) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00389-25 · Cited by 5
“…sustained replication and are amenable to evolution studies. rVSVs expressing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike were used to evaluate monoclonal and serum antibody escape, enabling the identification of therapeutic candidates and future antigenic variants (25, 26).”
Ji, C., Han, N., Cheng, Y., Shang, J., Weng, S., Yang, R., Zhou, H., & Wu, A. (2022) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v14051087 · Cited by 5
Mutational induction in SARS-CoV-2 major lineages by experimental exposure to neutralising sera
Brandolini, M., Dirani, G., Taddei, F., Zannoli, S., Denicolò, A., Arfilli, V., Battisti, A., Manera, M., Mancini, A., Grumiro, L., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-16533-4 · Cited by 5
Tang, H., Ke, Y., Wang, L., Wu, M., Sun, T., & Zhu, J. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph15081002 · Cited by 4
Abduljaleel, Z., Melebari, S., Athar, M., Dehlawi, S., Kumar, S., Aziz, S. A. A., Dannoun, A., Malik, S. M., Thasleem, J., & Doss, C. (2023) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2023.110798 · Cited by 5
Ameratunga, R., Mears, E., Leung, E. Y., Snell, R. G., Woon, S., Kelton, W., Medlicott, N. J., Jordan, A., Abbott, W. G. H., Steele, R. H., et al. (2023) · Clinical & Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1093/cei/uxad096 · Cited by 5
Shi, J., Jin, X., Ding, Y., Liu, X. K., Shen, A., Wu, Y., Peng, M., & Shen, C. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9121383 · Cited by 5
Emergence of a novel SARS-CoV-2 Pango lineage B.1.1.526 in West Bengal, India
Sarkar, R., Saha, R., Mallick, P., Sharma, R. P., Kaur, A., Dutta, S., & Chawla‐Sarkar, M. (2021) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2021.11.020 · Cited by 6
Novazzi, F., Baj, A., Pasciuta, R., Genoni, A. P., Ferrante, F. D., Tripiciano, R., Catanoso, G., Focosi, D., & Maggi, F. (2022) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.362 · Cited by 5
First description of two immune escape indian B.1.1.420 and B.1.617.1 SARS-CoV2 variants in FrancePreprint
Garcia, V., Vig, V., Peillard, L., Ramdani, A., Mohamed, S., & Halfon, P. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.05.12.443357 · Cited by 5
in silico Assessment of Antibody Drug Resistance to Bamlanivimab of SARS-CoV-2 Variant B.1.617Preprint
Zhang, L., Huynh, T., & Luan, B. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.05.12.443826 · Cited by 5
Chong, Z., Karl, C. E., Halfmann, P., Kawaoka, Y., Winkler, E. S., Yu, J., & Diamond, M. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.01.21.477296 · Cited by 5
Self-citationCell line bias in virus research: implications for viral propagation and biological interpretation
Kim, J.-Y. V., & Pickering, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1675100 · Cited by 4
Mapanguy, C. C. M., Batchi-Bouyou, A. L., Djontu, J. C., Pallerla, S. R., Ngoma, C. H., Linh, L. T. K., Rachakonda, S. P., Casadei, N., Angelov, A., Sonnabend, M., et al. (2022) · IJID Regions · doi:10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.03.009 · Cited by 5
“It is suggested that this lineage may have arisen through escape from antibody-mediated immunity ( Liu et al. 2021 ).”
Sorokina, M., Belapure, J., Tüting, C., Paschke, R., Papasotiriou, I., Rodrigues, J., & Kastritis, P. L. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167637 · Cited by 4
“This substitution was shown to strengthen binding of S protein with the human ACE2 receptor(52,53) and to be resistant against multiple mAbs.(54) Additionally, S477 was observed to mutate to arginine (S477R) and isoleucine (S477I) (Figure 2(e)).”
Kim, H., Chung, S. H., Kim, H. S., Kim, H.-S., Song, W., Hong, K. H., & Kim, J. (2022) · Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives · doi:10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0183 · Cited by 4
“In a study using 19 monoclonal antibodies, substitutions at this position occurred the most frequently [20], and all amino acid changes to A, K, Q, P, D, and G reduced recognition by antibodies [20,21].”
Chua, J. X., Durrant, L. G., Chok, Y. L., & Lai, O. M. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105379 · Cited by 4
The Lambda Variant in Argentina: Analyzing the Evolution and Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Lineage C.37
Jodar, M. S. N., Torres, C., Mojsiejczuk, L. N., Acuña, D., Valinotto, L. E., Goya, S., Natale, M. I., Lusso, S. B., Alexay, S., Amadío, A., et al. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15061382 · Cited by 4
Genomic surveillance of the Lambda SARS‐CoV‐2 variant in a global phylogenetic context
Mestanza, O., Lizárraga, W. C., Padilla, C., Jimenez‐Vasquez, V., Hurtado, V., Molina, I. S., Barcena, L., Acedo-Lazo, S. V., Núñez-Llanos, A., Gordillo, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.27889 · Cited by 4
“Two mutations (L452Q, F490S) are present in the receptor‐binding protein, and one of them (F490S) has shown reduced susceptibility to antibody neutralization.(5) Although it”
BackgroundEarly detection and improved genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants from deep sequencing data
Ramazzotti, D., Maspero, D., Angaroni, F., Spinelli, S., Antoniotti, M., Piazza, R., & Graudenzi, A. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104487 · Cited by 4
“Moreover, mutation S:G446V has been associated to attenuate monoclonal and serum antibody neutralization (Liu et al., 2021).”
Hua, R.-H., Zhang, S., Niu, B., Ge, J., Lan, T., & Bu, Z. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01190-23 · Cited by 4
Zhou, B., Sun, Y., Mao, H., Su, L., Lou, Y.-H., Yan, H., Yao, W., Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189969 · Cited by 4
“Specific Omicron variants outnumbered Delta variants, such as S339G, S373P, S375F, N440K, S477N, E484A, Q498R, N501Y, Y505H, H655Y, N679K, N764K, D796Y, Q954H, and N969K.”
BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 Serological Investigation of White-Tailed Deer in Northeastern Ohio
Boley, P. A., Dennis, P. M., Faraone, J. N., Xu, J., Liu, M., Niu, X., Gibson, S., Hale, V. L., Wang, Q., Liu, S., et al. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15071603 · Cited by 4
“Interestingly, a 484 aspartic-acid-to-lysine (E494K) substitution has been associated with resistance in convalescent serum neutralization [44], which may also contribute to the discrepancies among the ELISA positivity, with a lack of neutralizing antibody titer in some samples.”
BackgroundAhmed, N., Athavale, A., Tripathi, A. H., Subramaniam, A., Upadhyay, S. K., Pandey, A. K., Rai, R. C., & Awasthi, A. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1111/sji.13345 · Cited by 4
“139,140 The convalescent serum can neutralize viruses having the wild-type Spike protein (non-mutated).”
BackgroundInfluentialA mouse xenograft long‐term replication yields a SARS‐CoV‐2 Delta mutant with increased lethality
Kim, D., Kim, M., Kim, J.-S., Baek, K., Park, H., Park, S., Kang, B. M., Kim, S., Kim, M., Mostafa, M. N., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.29459 · Cited by 4
(2021) · Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry · doi:10.33263/briac125.68956914 · Cited by 4
“Particularly virulent forms have emerged from their natural animal hosts and threaten human communities [1,2].”
BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Tracing in Italy Highlights Lineages with Mutational Burden in Growing Subsets
Boccia, A. S., Tufano, R., Ferrucci, V., Sepe, L., Bianchi, M., Pascarella, S., Zollo, M., & Paolella, G. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23084155 · Cited by 4
Two Years of Evolutionary Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in Mexico, With Emphasis on the Variants of Concern
Flores-Alanis, A., Delgado, G., Espinosa-Camacho, L. F., Rodríguez‐Gómez, F., Cruz‐Rangel, A., Sandner-Miranda, L., Cravioto, A., & Morales-Espinosa, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.886585 · Cited by 4
Chen, H., Li, S., Wang, J., He, S., Wang, D., Qian, Z., Hu, D., Qi, F., Hu, K., Luo, C., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.968036 · Cited by 4
Cheng, M. H., Krieger, J., Xiang, Y., Kaynak, B., Shi, Y., Arditi, M., & Bahar, İ. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3907841 · Cited by 4
Cohort-specific serological recognition of SARS-CoV-2 variant RBD antigensPreprint
Fraser, D. D., Miller, M. R., Martin, C. M., Slessarev, M., Hahn, P., Higgins, I., Melo, C., Pest, M. A., Rothery, N., Wang, X., et al. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.01.10.21268250 · Cited by 4
“when tested with convalescence (polyclonal) serum [33]—a result that aligns with the data of this study (Figure 294”
ResultDu, W., Hurdiss, D. L., Drabek, D., Mykytyn, A. Z., Kaiser, F. K., González-Hernández, M. C., Muñoz‐Santos, D., Lamers, M. M., van Haperen, R., Li, W., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.17.480751 · Cited by 4
Schmidt, H., Schick, L., Podlech, J., Renzaho, A., Lieb, B., Diederich, S., Hankeln, T., Plachter, B., & Kriege, O. (2025) · npj Genomic Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41525-025-00463-x · Cited by 3
Youn, S., Jeong, D., Kwon, H., Han, E., Kim, S., & Jung, I. (2025) · BioData Mining · doi:10.1186/s13040-025-00476-3 · Cited by 3
“Q677 exists as two variants: Q677P and Q677H, contributing to host cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 [29].”
The Mutational Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern Recovered From Egyptian Patients in 2021
Seadawy, M. G., Binsuwaidan, R., Alotaibi, B. S., El-Masry, T. A., El-Harty, B. E., Gad, A. F., Elkhatib, W. F., & El-Bouseary, M. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.923137 · Cited by 3
Vanan, A. G., Maghsood, F., Yadegari, H., Bahadori, T., Zarnani, A., Razavi, S. A., Jeddi‐Tehrani, M., Amiri, M. M., & Shokri, F. (2023) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001728 · Cited by 3
Dynamic expedition of leading mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins
Hasan, M., He, Z., Jia, M., Leung, A. C. F., Natarajan, K., Xu, W., Yap, S., Zhou, F., Chen, S., Su, H., et al. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.037 · Cited by 3
“Their locations within the epitope of several important neutralizing antibodies enable them to enhance the immune escape capabilities of the virus [69,76–78].”
Paradis, N. J., & Wu, C. F. (2024) · Virus Evolution · doi:10.1093/ve/veae089 · Cited by 4
Zornikova, K. V., Dianov, D. V., Ivanova, N. O., Davydova, V. D., Nenasheva, T. A., Fefelova, E. I., & Васильевна, Б. А. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms252312591 · Cited by 3
Berkell, M., Górska, A., Smet, M., Bachelet, D., Gentilotti, E., Guedes, M. N. P., Yusti, A.-M. F., Mazzaferri, F., Lizarazo, E., Matheeussen, V., et al. (2025) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2025.30.10.2400038 · Cited by 3
Sidiq, K. R. (2021) · passer · doi:10.24271/psr.27 · Cited by 3
A Bacterial Cell-Based Assay To Study SARS-CoV-2 Protein-Protein Interactions
Springstein, B. L., Deighan, P., Grabe, G. J., & Hochschild, A. (2021) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02936-21 · Cited by 4
Variation Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Complete Sequences from Iran
Moradi, J., Moradi, P., Alvandi, A., Abiri, R., & Moghoofei, M. (2022) · Future Virology · doi:10.2217/fvl-2021-0056 · Cited by 3
Odongo, S., Okella, H., Ndekezi, C., Okee, M. S., Namayanja, M., Mujuni, B., Sterckx, Y. G. ‐., Kizito, D., Radwanska, M., Magez, S., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279428 · Cited by 3
Капуста, К., McGowan, A., Banerjee, S., Wang, J., Kołodziejczyk, W., & Leszczyński, J. (2024) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.3390/cimb46110745 · Cited by 3
Antiviral Resistance against Viral Mutation: Praxis and Policy for SARS-CoV-2
Penner, R. (2021) · Computational and Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1515/cmb-2020-0119 · Cited by 3
Glaß, M., Misiak, D., Misiak, C., Müller, S., Rausch, A., Angermann, K., Hoyer, M., Zabel, R., Kehlen, A., Möbius, B., et al. (2021) · Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1515/labmed-2021-0092 · Cited by 3
Žemaitis, L., Alzbutas, G., Gečys, D., Komissarov, A. B., Pautienius, A., Ugenskienė, R., Šukys, M., & Lesauskaitė, V. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10071356 · Cited by 4
“An in vitro study for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein mutations responsible for antibody evasiveness has identified that the S494P mutation reduces SARS-CoV-2 neutralization by 3–5-fold in some convalescent sera [45].”
BackgroundAshoor, D., Marzouq, M., Trabelsi, K., Chlif, S., Abotalib, N., Khalaf, N. B., Ramadan, A. R., & Fathallah, M. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.868205 · Cited by 3
“455 456 In addition to Glu484, other mutations on RBD binding hot spots residues, have been also linked 457 to antibody binding and neutralization including mutations on Lys417, Gly446, Phe456, Asn501, 458 Gly477 and Asp614 [28-31].”
BackgroundMoisan, A., Soares, A., Oliveira, F. D., Alessandri-Gradt, É., Lecoquierre, F., Fourneaux, S., Plantier, J., & Gueudin, M. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15051115 · Cited by 3
Hanifa, M., Salman, M., Fatima, M., Mukhtar, N., Almajhdi, F. N., Zaman, N., Suleman, M., Ali, S. S., Waheed, Y., & Khan, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.940863 · Cited by 3
“277); destabilizing the structure of the respective protein was also previously reported to confer resistance to four different types of sera tested (Figure 2A) (Liu et al., 2021).”
SARS-CoV-2 variant with higher affinity to ACE2 shows reduced sera neutralization susceptibilityPreprint
Vogel, M., Chang, X., Augusto, G. S., Mohsen, M. O., Speiser, D. E., & Bachmann, M. F. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.04.433887 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Z., VanBlargan, L. A., Bloyet, L.-M., Rothlauf, P. W., Chen, R. E., Stumpf, S., Zhao, H., Errico, J. M., Theel, E. S., Liebeskind, M. J., Alford, B., Buchser, W. J., Ellebedy, A. H., Fremont, D. H., Diamond, M. S., & Whelan, S. P. J.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Diamond, Michael S.
- Whelan, Sean P.J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Host & Microbe
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 477-488.e4
- ISSN
- 1931-3128 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7839837
- OpenAlex
- W3121995178
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 255 · 2021: 302
- FWCI
- 55.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 374 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cell Host & Microbe (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Washington University in St. Louis
- University of Washington
- Saint Louis University
- National Institutes of Health (75N93019C00062, R01 AI127828, R01 AI157155, R37 AI059371)
- AbbVie
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR001117S0019)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, antibody escape mutants, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, receptor binding domain, E484K mutation
- MeSH terms
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibodies, Viral, Chlorocebus aethiops, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Neutralization Tests, Protein Binding, Receptors, Virus, Vero Cells, Amino Acid Substitution, Mice, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review