Cited by 156Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Short-term individual nutritional care as part of routine clinical setting improves outcome and quality of life in malnourished medical patients

Starke, Juliane, Schneider, Heinz, Alteheld, Birgit, Stehle, Peter, Meier, Rémy·2011·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims Strategies to treat malnutrition lack practicability in the hospital setting. The present study aimed at developing and evaluating a routinely manageable concept for an improved nutritional care of malnourished in-hospital patients. Methods A randomized controlled intervention study was conducted. 132 risk patients defined by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, were randomized to individualised nutrition support (intervention group [n = 66]) or standard hospital care (control group [n = 66]). Body weight, plasma vitamin levels, quality of life, complications, antibiotic therapies, readmissions and mortality were assessed. Results Nutrition interventions led to higher intakes (mean [standard deviation]) in energy (1553 [341] kcal vs. 1115 [381] kcal, p Conclusions Malnourished patients profit from nutrition support regarding nutrition status and quality of life. They have fewer complications, need fewer antibiotics and are less often re-hospitalised.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.07.021

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Five RCTs, all performed in the hospital setting, were identified providing evidence for comprehensive individualized nutritional interventions in older persons with malnutrition or at risk of malnutrition.

    “Five RCTs (all performed in the hospital setting) were identified providing evidence for comprehensive individualized nutritional interventions in older persons with malnutrition or at risk of malnutrition (43)(44)(45)(46)(47).”
  • Three RCTs of low to acceptable quality in older hospitalized patients at nutritional risk with various diagnoses or after acute stroke reported positive effects on energy and protein intake, body weight, complications, antibiotic use, readmissions, and functional measures.

    “Three RCTs of low to acceptable quality investigated the effects of comprehensive individualized nutritional interventions in older hospitalized patients at nutritional risk with various diagnoses (43,44) or after acute stroke (45), and reported positive effects on energy and protein intake (43,44), BW (44,45), complications, antibiotic use, readmissions (44) and functional measures (44,45).”
  • No effect was found regarding length of hospital stay in the three RCTs of comprehensive individualized nutritional interventions.

    “No effect was found regarding the length of hospital stay (44,45).”
  • All three RCTs showed benefits concerning quality of life in the group receiving individual nutritional care compared to usual care.

    “Additionally, all three studies showed benefits concerning the quality of life in the group receiving individual nutritional J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f care compared to the group with usual care (43)(44)(45).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Starke, J., Schneider, H., Alteheld, B., Stehle, P., & Meier, R.
Affiliations
  • Kantonsspital Baselland (CH)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
194-201
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026225430
Cited by
156
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
malnutrition, routine clinical practice, quality of life, nutritional risk screening, energy and protein intake, weight maintenance, plasma vitamin levels, vitamin C, in-hospital complications, antibiotic use, hospital readmission, mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Ascorbic Acid, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glutathione, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, 24,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D 3, Treatment Outcome, Malnutrition, Young Adult, Elder Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review