Cited by 17Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A protein-supplemented very-low-calorie diet does not mitigate reductions in lean mass and resting metabolic rate in subjects with overweight or obesity: A randomized controlled trial

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The European Food Safety Authority recently recommended an increase in the protein content of total diet replacement (TDR) products from 50 to 75 g/day. The rationale was to minimize reductions in lean mass (LM) and resting metabolic rate (RMR) that occur with weight loss, and thereby facilitate maintenance of lost weight. We sought to directly compare the efficacy of TDR regimens with the new vs the current protein requirement. METHODS: ) to very-low-calorie diets (VLCD) with either 52 or 77 g/day protein for 8 weeks (total energy intake of 600 or 700 kcal/day, respectively). LM was determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and RMR by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Attrition rate was 22% in both groups. Both VLCDs decreased body weight, fat mass, LM, and RMR (all P < 0.05). Significant time-by-group interactions were detected for weight and fat mass (both P < 0.05), with corresponding reductions being smaller in the higher-protein than the standard-protein VLCD, likely because of the added calories. On the other hand, reductions in LM (6% from baseline) and RMR (9-10% from baseline) did not differ between groups (P = 0.155 and P = 0.389, respectively), and the contribution of LM to total weight loss was identical (27 ± 2% of lost weight, P = 0.973). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the proposed increase in the protein content of TDR products does not attenuate reductions in LM and RMR in individuals with overweight and obesity who are treated with <800 kcal/day VLCDs for 2 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT04156165.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.10.006

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Magkos, F., Hjorth, M. F., Asping, S., Rosenkrans, M. I., Rasmussen, S. I., Ritz, C., Sjödin, A., & Geiker, N. R. W.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Magkos, Faidon
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
5726-5733
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3205024021
Cited by
17
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
very low calorie diet, protein supplementation, total diet replacement, lean body mass, resting metabolic rate, weight loss, obesity, overweight, weight maintenance, fat mass, protein requirements
MeSH terms
Adult, Basal Metabolism, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Dietary Supplements, Caloric Restriction, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review