Cited by 92

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eliminate or reformulate ultra-processed foods? Biological mechanisms matter

Tobias, Deirdre K., Hall, Kevin D.·2021·Cell Metabolism

Abstract

Increased ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in the food supply have plausibly caused the rise in obesity prevalence and related chronic diseases. To address this public health concern, policies targeting reformulation or elimination of UPF categories will require improved understanding of the biological mechanisms whereby UPFs lead to overconsumption and poor health.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.10.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The available evidence indicates that ultra-processed foods differ from unprocessed and minimally processed foods in several aspects, potentially explaining their plausible links with adverse health outcomes.

    “The available evidence indicates that ultra-processed foods differ from unprocessed and minimally processed foods in several aspects, potentially explaining their plausible links with adverse health outcomes.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Chang, 2021, Association between childhood consumption of ultraprocessed food and adiposity trajectories in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Birth Cohort, JAMA Pediatr., 175, e211573, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1573 · DOI
  2. Forde, 2020, Ultra-processing or oral processing? A role for energy density and eating rate in moderating energy intake from processed foods, Curr. Dev. Nutr., 4, a019, 10.1093/cdn/nzaa019 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Liu, 2021, Trends in food sources and diet quality among US children and adults, 2003-2018, JAMA Netw. Open, 4, e215262, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5262 · DOI
  4. Marino, 2021, A systematic review of worldwide consumption of ultra-processed foods: findings and criticisms, Nutrients, 13, 2778, 10.3390/nu13082778 · DOI
  5. Pagliai, 2021, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Br. J. Nutr., 125, 308, 10.1017/S0007114520002688 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Small, 2019, Processed foods and food reward, Science, 363, 346, 10.1126/science.aav0556 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wang, 2021, Trends in consumption of ultraprocessed foods among US youths aged 2-19 years, 1999-2018, JAMA, 326, 519, 10.1001/jama.2021.10238 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tobias, D. K., & Hall, K. D.
Venue
Cell Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
2314-2315
ISSN
1550-4131
Cited by
92
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • National Institutes of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review