Cited by 269Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The subjective experience of emotion: a fearful view

Open access
LeDoux, Joseph E, Hofmann, Stefan G·2018·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

We argue that subjective emotional experience, the feeling, is the essence of an emotion, and that objective manifestations in behavior and in body or brain physiology are, at best, indirect indicators of these inner experiences. As a result, the most direct way to assess conscious emotional feelings is through verbal self-report. This creates a methodological barrier to studies of conscious feelings in animals. While the behavioral and physiological responses are not 'emotions,' they contribute to emotions indirectly, and sometimes profoundly. Whether non-verbal animals have emotional experiences is a difficult, maybe impossible, question to answer in the positive or negative. But because behavioral and physiological responses are important contributors to emotions, and the circuits underlying these are highly conserved, studies of animals have an important role in understanding how emotions are expressed and regulated in the brain. Conflation of circuits that directly give rise to conscious emotional feelings with circuits that indirectly influences these conscious feelings has hampered progress in efforts to understand emotions, and also to understand and to develop treatments for emotional disorders. Recognition of differences in these circuits will allow research in animals to have a lasting impact on understanding of human emotions as research goes forward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.011

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It has been argued that such different-level processes do not necessarily have to contribute to the same conscious emotional state.

    “It has been argued that such different-level processes do not necessarily have to contribute to the same conscious emotional state (cf. LeDoux and Hofmann, 2018).”
  • In theoretical work on emotional consciousness, LeDoux and colleagues argue that lower-order responses can contribute to, but are not necessary for, the conscious experience of any emotional cognitive state.

    “In theoretical work on emotional consciousness, LeDoux and colleagues argue that lower-order responses can contribute to, but are not necessary for, the conscious experience of any emotional cognitive state (LeDoux & Brown, 2017;LeDoux & Hofmann, 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [21]Hassin RR, Uleman JS, Bargh JA (Eds): The New Unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  2. [24]Panksepp J: Affective Neuroscience. New York: Oxford U. Press; 1998.
  3. [52]Ortony A, Clore GL: Emotions, moods, and conscious awareness. Cogn Emot 1989, 3: 125– 137.
  4. [56]Barrett LF, Russell JA (Eds): The Psychological Construction of Emotion. New York: Guilford Press; 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeDoux, J. E., & Hofmann, S. G.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
LeDoux, Joseph E
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Pages
67-72
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770664338
Cited by
268
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (203730/Z/16/Z, BB/N019814/1, 203139)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-13-015)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (G0902373, MR/L009013/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N019814/1)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT007257)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
subjective emotional experience, fear, emotional circuits, emotional disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review