Cited by 114Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

D-cycloserine enhancement of exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder depends on the success of exposure sessions

Open access
Smits, Jasper A.J., Rosenfield, David, Otto, Michael W., Marques, Luana, Davis, Michelle L., Meuret, Alicia E., Simon, Naomi M., Pollack, Mark H. +1 more·2013·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Objective The evidence for the efficacy of D-cycloserine (DCS) for augmenting cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders has been mixed. Guided by preclinical research and initial findings from a small-scale study involving humans, we tested the hypothesis that DCS enhancement of exposure therapy would be specific to successful exposure sessions. Method Medication-free adults with generalized social anxiety disorder (N = 145) received 50 mg of DCS or placebo 1 h before each of 5 exposure sessions that were part of a standardized 12-session group CBT protocol. Participants provided fear ratings at the beginning and just before the end of exposure exercises. Independent raters, blind to group assignment, administered the clinical global impression improvement and severity scales at each session and at posttreatment. Results Mixed-effects analyses revealed that, among patients who reported low fear at the end of an exposure session, those who had received DCS evidenced significantly greater clinical improvement at the next session, relative to those who had received placebo. In contrast, when exposure end fear was high, patients receiving DCS exhibited less clinical improvement at the following session than patients receiving placebo. Similarly, patients who had received DCS evidenced lower clinical severity at posttreatment, relative to patients who had received placebo, only when their average end fear for medication-augmented sessions had been in the low to moderate range. Finally, these moderating effects of exposure success as indexed by end fear were not better accounted for by within-session extinction. Conclusions The efficacy of DCS for augmenting exposure-based CBT depends on the success of exposure sessions. These findings may help guide the development of an algorithm for the effective use of DCS for augmenting exposure-based CBT. Trial registry http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, ID# NCT00633984, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00633984.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.06.020

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • D-cycloserine (DCS) enhances the acquisition of the extinction memory.

    “administration of the NMDAR partial agonist D-cycloserine (DCS) enhances the acquisition of the extinction memory”

    From Retrieval-Dependent Mechanisms Affecting Emotional Memory Persistence: Reconsolidation, Extinction, and the Space in Between (2020) · cites this paper as Smits et al., 2013

    The Discussion explicitly distinguishes the two processes: it says DCS appears to aid consolidation or retention of fear extinction rather than extinction learning within a session. Its clinical findings also make DCS benefit conditional on exposure sessions ending with low fear, not a general enhancement of acquisition. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hofmann SG Otto MW Cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder: Evidence-based and disorder-specific treatment techniques London Routledge 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smits, J. A. J., Rosenfield, D., Otto, M. W., Marques, L., Davis, M. L., Meuret, A. E., Simon, N. M., Pollack, M. H., & Hofmann, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, Stefan G.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
1455-1461
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157504515
Cited by
114
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 3
FWCI
20.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH075889, K23MH096029, R01MH078308)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
D-cycloserine, social anxiety disorder, exposure therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, drug augmentation, treatment response, treatment algorithm
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Cycloserine, Double-Blind Method, Fear, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Models, Statistical, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review