Cited by 41Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersNeuroscience and Music Perception

Connectivity and the search for specializations in the language-capable brain

Open access
Mars, Rogier B, Eichert, Nicole, Jbabdi, Saad, Verhagen, Lennart, Rushworth, Matthew F.S.·2018·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

The search for the anatomical basis of language has traditionally been a search for specializations. More recently such research has focused both on aspects of brain organization that are unique to humans and aspects shared with other primates. This work has mostly concentrated on the architecture of connections between brain areas. However, as specializations can take many guises, comparison of anatomical organization across species is often complicated. We demonstrate how viewing different types of specializations within a common framework allows one to better appreciate both shared and unique aspects of brain organization. We illustrate this point by discussing recent insights into the anatomy of the dorsal language pathway to the frontal cortex and areas for laryngeal control in the motor cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.001

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computational processing might have been facilitated by some of the changes presented here, at least in some of the circuits that have expanded in our lineage.

    “Computational processing might have been facilitated by some of the changes presented here, at least in some of the circuits that have expanded in our lineage111,112, since subtle maturational differences early in development113 may have had a considerable impact on the phenotype.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mars, R. B., Eichert, N., Jbabdi, S., Verhagen, L., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Mars, Rogier B
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
21
Pages
19-26
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774473118
Cited by
41
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (203730/Z/16/Z, 203139/Z/16)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N019814/1)
  • Medical Research Council (G0902373, MR/L009013/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
language specialization, brain connectivity, frontal cortex, laryngeal control, motor cortex, comparative neuroanatomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review