Cited by 268Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Specialisation within the prefrontal cortex: the ventral prefrontal cortex and associative learning

Passingham, R.E., Toni, I., Rushworth, M.F.S.·2000·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

This paper provides evidence that the ventral prefrontal cortex plays a role in the learning of tasks in which subjects must learn to associate visual cues and responses. Imaging with both positron-emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic-resonance imaging (fMRI) reveals learning-related increases in activity when normal subjects learn visual associative tasks. Evidence is also presented from an event-related fMRI study that activity in this area is time-locked both to the presentation of the visual stimuli and also to the time of the motor response. Finally, it is shown in a study of monkeys that removal of the ventral prefrontal area 12 (including 45 A) impairs the ability of monkeys to relearn a visual associative task (visual matching), even though there were no demands on working memory. It is, therefore, proposed that the ventral prefrontal cortex constitutes part of the circuitry via which associations are formed between visual cues and the actions or choices that they specify. On the basis of the existing anatomical and electrophysiological data, it is argued that the prefrontal cortex is the only area that can represent cues, responses and outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002210000405

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased activity of bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PMv/IFG) in the dual-task condition before training suggests that dual-task conditions may require greater control over stimulus-response mapping rules, even when the mappings are spatially compatible.

    “The increased activity of bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PMv/IFG) in our dual-task condition before training suggests that dual-task conditions may require greater control over stimulus-response mapping rules, even in cases in which the mappings are spatially compatible.”

    From The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity (2005) · cites this paper as Passingham et al., 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passingham, R. E., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2000-05-10
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
103-113
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W1995787801
Cited by
268
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
ventral prefrontal cortex, associative learning, visual matching, working memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Humans, Macaca, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review