Cited by 89Psychological and Educational Research StudiesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentScience Education and Pedagogy

Curiosity as a Metacognitive Feeling

Open access
Goupil, Louise, Proust, Joëlle·2023·Cognition

Abstract

Curious information-seeking is known to be a key driver for learning, but characterizing this important psychological phenomenon remains a challenge. In this article, we argue that solving this challenge requires qualifying the relationships between metacognition and curiosity. The idea that curiosity is a metacognitive competence has been resisted: researchers have assumed both that young children and non-human animals can be genuinely curious, and that metacognition requires conceptual and culturally situated resources that are unavailable to young children and non-human animals. Here, we argue that this resistance is unwarranted given accumulating evidence that metacognition can be deployed procedurally, and we defend the view that curiosity is a metacognitive feeling. Our metacognitive view singles out two monitoring steps as a triggering condition for curiosity: evaluating one's own informational needs, and predicting the likelihood that explorations of the proximate environment afford significant information gains. We review empirical evidence and computational models of curiosity, and show that they fit well with this metacognitive account, while on the contrary, they remain difficult to explain by a competing account according to which curiosity is a basic attitude of questioning. Finally, we propose a new way to construe the relationships between curiosity and the human-specific communicative practice of questioning, discuss the issue of how children may learn to express their curiosity through interactions with others, and conclude by briefly exploring the implications of our proposal for educational practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105325

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to self-determination theory, competence, autonomy and relatedness are fundamental factors to promote for more efficient educational trainings.

    “following the self-determination theory [48, 17], these are fundamental factors to promote for more efficient educational trainings.”
  • Lack of control over the task might alter children's sense of autonomy and competency, which are central factors for motivation and curiosity according to self-determination theory.

    “this lack of control over the task might also alter with children's sense of autonomy and competency, which are central factors for motivation and curiosity according to the Self-Determination Theory( [48], [17]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goupil, L., & Proust, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institut Jean Nicod (FR)
Corresponding author
Goupil, Louise
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
231
Pages
105325
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283687550
Cited by
89
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-EURE-, ANR-17-EURE-0017, ANR-17)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
curiosity, metacognition, information seeking, information needs, questioning, children's curiosity, teaching practice
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Animals, Child, Preschool, Communication, Emotions, Exploratory Behavior, Humans, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review