The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 · Cited by 2,726
Chu, R. J.-C. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.011 · Cited by 212
Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M.-E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027 · Cited by 160
The impact of individual differences on e‐learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach
Lu, H., & Chiou, M. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00937.x · Cited by 150
Kay, R. H., & Knaack, L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.001 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Comber, 1997, The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes, Educational Research, 39, 123, 10.1080/0013188970390201 · DOI · Paper page
- Ding, 2011, Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning, Computers & Education, 56, 325, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.004 · DOI
- Garland, 2005, Do gender and learning style play a role in howonline courses should be designed?, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4, 67
- Gray, 2004, The training of teachers and trainers: innovative practices, skills and competencies in the use of e-learning, European Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning
- Ho, 2010, Construction safety training via e-learning: learning effectiveness and user satisfaction, Computers & Education, 55, 858, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Hung, 2010, Learner readiness for online learning: scale development and student perceptions, Computers & Education, 55, 1080, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2007, Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: a study of China and the UK, Computers & Education, 48, 301, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Lowrie, 2011, Gender differences in students’ mathematics game playing, Computers & Education, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.010 · DOI
- Ong, 2006, Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance, Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 816, 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Putrevu, 2001, Exploring the origins and information processing differences between men and women: implications for advertisers, Academy of Marketing Science Review [Online]
- Robin, 2009, Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS), Computers & Education, 52, 730, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.015 · DOI
- Volman, 2005, A variety of roles for a new type of teacher educational technology and the teaching profession, Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 15, 10.1016/j.tate.2004.11.003 · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.11.003
- Whitley, 1997, Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: a meta-analysis, Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1, 10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00026-X · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Yilmaz, R. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085 · Cited by 514
Padilla-Meléndez, A., del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014 · Cited by 447
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1 · Cited by 438
Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Rondán-Cataluña, F. J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140460 · Cited by 160
Liao, C.-H., & Wu, J.-Y. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104599 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- González-Gómez, F., Guardiola, J., Martín Rodríguez, Ó., & Montero Alonso, M. Á.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 283-290
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091508823
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 35.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
