Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 604

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation

Porter, Wendy W., Graham, Charles R., Spring, Kristian A., Welch, Kyle R.·2014·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bolliger, 2009, Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education, Distance Education, 30, 103, 10.1080/01587910902845949 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Carbonell, 2012, Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning, The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 29, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.004 · DOI
  3. Donnelly, 2010, Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended learning problem-based learning, Computers & Education, 42, 350, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.012 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dziuban, 2011, A course is a course is a course: factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments, The Internet and Higher Education, 14, 236, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.003 · DOI
  5. Garrison, 2004, Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Garrison, 2013, Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: two case studies, The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 24, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Graham, 2007, Blended learning environments, Vol. 2, 269
  8. Graham, 2012, A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. King, 2012, Blended learning environments in higher education: a case study of how professors make it happen, Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 25, 44
  10. Korr, 2012, Transitioning an adult-serving university to a blended learning model, The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60, 2, 10.1080/07377363.2012.649123 · DOI
  11. Liu, 2011, Blending at small colleges: challenges and solutions, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15, 58
  12. López-Pérez, 2011, Blended learning in higher education: students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes, Computers & Education, 56, 818, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Marshall, 2010, Change, technology and higher education: are universities capable of organisational change?, Research in Learning Technology, 18, 179, 10.1080/09687769.2010.529107 · DOI
  14. Matzat, 2013, Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers' professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison, Computers & Education, 60, 40, 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.006 · DOI
  15. McGee, 2012, Blended course design: a synthesis of best practices, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16, 7
  16. Moskal, 2013, Blended learning: a dangerous idea?, The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Niemiec, 2010, An administrator's guide to the whys and hows of blended learning, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14, 91
  18. Norberg, 2011, A time-based blended learning model, On the Horizon, 19, 207, 10.1108/10748121111163913 · DOI · Paper page
  19. O'Dowd, 2013, Telecollaborative networks in university higher education: overcoming barriers to integration, The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 47, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.02.001 · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.02.001
  20. Owens, 2012, Hitting the nail on the head: the importance of specific staff development for effective blended learning, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 389, 10.1080/14703297.2012.728877 · DOI
  21. Salmon, 2005, Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions, Research in Learning Technology, 13, 201, 10.1080/09687760500376439 · doi:10.1080/09687760500376439
  22. Sharpe, 2006, Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools, Research in Learning Technology, 14, 135, 10.1080/09687760600668503 · DOI
  23. Shea, 2007, Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: a study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11, 73
  24. Taylor, 2012, Beyond blended learning: a case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university, The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 54, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.003 · DOI
  25. Toth, 2008, Post-implementation insights about a hybrid degree program, TechTrends, 52, 76, 10.1007/s11528-008-0159-4 · doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0159-4
  26. Vaughan, 2007, Perspectives on blended learning in higher education, International Journal on E-Learning, 6, 81
  27. Wallace, 2010, Implementing blended learning: policy implications for universities, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13, 7
  28. Wu, 2010, A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment, Computers & Education, 55, 155, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Young, 2002, “Hybrid” teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction, Chronicle of Higher Education, 48

Cited by

See all 604

Metadata

Authors
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
75
Pages
185-195
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
OpenAlex
W2019475688
Cited by
604
References
0
FWCI
152.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
The paper
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.