Cited by 14Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

Video-based automatic people counting for public transport: On-bus versus off-bus deployment

Open access
McCarthy, Chris, Ghaderi, Hadi, Martí, Felip, Jayaraman, Prem, Dia, Hussein·2025·Computers in Industry

Abstract

Interest in Automatic People Counting (APC) for crowd detection and management is rapidly growing. While a range of Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and systems exist, video analytics is emerging as a particularly attractive option — especially for applications where more traditional methods of people counting are not available, unreliable or expensive. In this paper we focus on automatic people counting in the public transport context – specifically, rail replacement bus services – in which bus companies are typically contracted to provide bus services to replace train services during periods of planned and unplanned line disruption. This presents a particularly compelling use-case for video-based people counting, while also presenting unique challenges. Field trials are thus vital to the proper assessment of video-based APC solutions, however remain relatively scarce in the literature. While datasets to support research and benchmarking exist, these do not capture the intrinsic complexities of real-world deployment and the implications of selected configurations — in particular, on-vehicle versus off-vehicle use cases. In this paper, we evaluate our own video-based APC solution, representative of state-of-the-art approaches in the literature, in two separate extensive (i.e, multi-day) metropolitan field trials covering both on and off-bus use-cases. Through real-world deployment of the system in both settings, we highlight key differences with respect to APC accuracy, as well as other practical considerations, and the validity of underlying assumptions in both on and off-bus scenarios. • A practical evaluation of video-based passenger counting in real-world use-cases. • Field trials comparing on-bus versus off-bus deployment configurations • Insights on configuration, environmental factors, and operational considerations. • Priorities for future research on scalable, low-cost real-time video-based APC systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compind.2024.104195

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, C., Ghaderi, H., Martí, F., Jayaraman, P., & Dia, H.
Affiliations
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, Chris
Venue
Computers in Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
164
Pages
104195
ISSN
0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402889922
Cited by
14
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computers in Industry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords
video analysis, public transport, bus services, crowd detection, field trials, real-time video processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review