Cited by 43Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

Passenger flow counting in buses based on deep learning using surveillance video

Hsu, Ya-Wen, Wang, Ting-Yen, Perng, Jau-Woei·2020·Optik

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163675

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, Y.-W., Wang, T.-Y., & Perng, J.-W.
Affiliations
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Corresponding author
Perng, Jau-Woei
Venue
Optik
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
202
Pages
163675
ISSN
0030-4026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985210540
Cited by
43
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Optik (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
surveillance video, Single Shot MultiBox Detector, particle filter, data association, passenger tracking, door opening detection, occlusion handling, dense crowds, public transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review