Cited by 81

Probing the transcriptome of neuronal cell types

Nelson, Sacha B, Hempel, Chris, Sugino, Ken·2006·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Distinct neuronal cell types acquire and maintain their identity by expressing different genes. Recently it has become feasible to measure this cell type specific expression by isolating and amplifying mRNA from small populations of fluorescently labeled neurons and probing this mRNA with microarrays. Prior to this, most neuronal gene expression studies used tissue homogenates or randomly selected single cells and were, therefore, not well suited to studying transcriptional differences between cell types. Microarray studies of purified cell types have enabled investigators to identify the transcriptional signatures of, for example, subtypes of pyramidal neurons and interneurons in the neocortex, modulatory dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons, and the striatal neurons that form the so-called 'direct' and 'indirect' pathways through the basal ganglia. These studies are opening up new approaches to understanding brain circuitry, plasticity and pathology and are refining the concept of the neuronal cell type.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.006

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The identity and physiological state of neuron types are largely determined by their patterns of gene expression.

    “To a large extent, the identity and physiological state of neuron types are determined by their patterns of gene expression (Nelson et al., 2006, Hobert et al., 2010).”

    From Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain (2012) · cites this paper as Nelson et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, S. B., Hempel, C., & Sugino, K.
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
571-576
ISSN
0959-4388
Cited by
81
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review