Cited by 51Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesSleep and related disorders

A replication of the 5–7day dream-lag effect with comparison of dreams to future events as control for baseline matching

Blagrove, Mark, Henley-Einion, Josie, Barnett, Amanda, Edwards, Darren, Heidi Seage, C.·2011·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

The dream-lag effect refers to there being, after the frequent incorporation of memory elements from the previous day into dreams (the day-residue), a lower incorporation of memory elements from 2 to 4 days before the dream, but then an increased incorporation of memory elements from 5 to 7 days before the dream. Participants (n=8, all female) kept a daily diary and a dream diary for 14 days and then rated the level of matching between every dream report and every daily diary record. Baseline matching was assessed by comparing all dream reports to all diary records for days that occurred after the dream. A significant dream-lag effect for the 5-7 day period, compared to baseline and compared to the 2-4 day period, was found. This may indicate a memory processing function for sleep, which the dream content may reflect. Participants' and three independent judges' mean ratings also confirmed a significant day-residue effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2010.07.006

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After the first peak in incorporation of waking memories into DE (day-residue effect), there is a second peak 6-7 days later (dream-lag effect).

    “It is well-known that after the first peak in incorporation of waking memories into DE (1 day from the events) called “day-residue effect,” there is a second peak following the experience 6–7 days later, i.e., dream-lag effect (Nielsen et al., 2004; Blagrove et al., 2011; Eichenlaub et al., 2019).”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Blagrove et al., 2011

  • Delayed incorporation of daytime events holds for REM sleep dreams but not NREM-DE.

    “This delayed incorporation of daytime events has been found to hold for REM sleep dreams but not NREM-DE (Blagrove et al., 2011; van Rijn et al., 2015).”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Blagrove et al., 2011

  • Some dream experiences could incorporate waking events.

    “In other words, some dream experiences could incorporate waking events.48–51”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blagrove, M., Henley-Einion, J., Barnett, A., Edwards, D., & Heidi Seage, C.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Blagrove, Mark
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
384-391
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042997274
Cited by
51
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
dream content, dream recall, dream diary
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Dreams, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review