Cited by 18Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersMemory Processes and Influences

The nature of delayed dream incorporation (‘dream-lag effect’): Personally significant events persist, but not major daily activities or concerns

Open access
Eichenlaub, Jean‐Baptiste, van Rijn, Elaine, Phelan, Mairéad, Ryder, Larnia, Gaskell, M. Gareth, Lewis, Penelope A., P. Walker, Matthew, Blagrove, Mark·2019·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

Incorporation of details from waking life events into rapid eye movement (REM) sleep dreams has been found to be highest on the 2 nights after, and then 5-7 nights after, the event. These are termed, respectively, the day-residue and dream-lag effects. This study is the first to categorize types of waking life experiences and compare their incorporation into dreams across multiple successive nights. Thirty-eight participants completed a daily diary each evening and a dream diary each morning for 14 days. In the daily diary, three categories of experiences were reported: major daily activities (MDAs), personally significant events (PSEs) and major concerns (MCs). After the 14-day period each participant identified the correspondence between items in their daily diaries and subsequent dream reports. The day-residue and dream-lag effects were found for the incorporation of PSEs into dreams (effect sizes of .33 and .27, respectively), but only for participants (n = 19) who had a below-median total number of correspondences between daily diary items and dream reports (termed "low-incorporators" as opposed to "high-incorporators"). Neither the day-residue or dream-lag effects were found for MDAs or MCs. This U-shaped timescale of incorporation of events from daily life into dreams has been proposed to reflect REM sleep-dependent memory consolidation, possibly related to emotional memory processing. This study had a larger sample size of dreams than any dream-lag study hitherto with trained participants. Coupled with previous successful replications, there is thus substantial evidence supporting the dream-lag effect and further explorations of its mechanism, including its neural underpinnings, are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12697

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After the first peak in incorporation of waking memories into DE (day-residue effect), there is a second peak 6-7 days later (dream-lag effect).

    “It is well-known that after the first peak in incorporation of waking memories into DE (1 day from the events) called “day-residue effect,” there is a second peak following the experience 6–7 days later, i.e., dream-lag effect (Nielsen et al., 2004; Blagrove et al., 2011; Eichenlaub et al., 2019).”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Eichenlaub et al., 2019

    The Introduction describes two peaks in dream incorporation: a day-residue effect at 1–2 days and a dream-lag effect at 5–7 days. The cited sentence captures the pattern but narrows those periods to 1 day and 6–7 days; the Results test the broader periods, not those narrower windows. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. De Koninck, J., Wong, C., & Hébert, G. (2012). Types of dream incorporations of language learning and learning efficiency. Journal of Sleep Research, 21(Suppl. S1): 190 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2012.01044.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eichenlaub, J., van Rijn, E., Phelan, M., Ryder, L., Gaskell, M. G., Lewis, P. A., P. Walker, M., & Blagrove, M.
Affiliations
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Swansea University Sleep Laboratory Department of Psychology Swansea University Swansea UK
  • University of York (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Center for Human Sleep Science Department of Psychology University of California Berkeley CA USA
Corresponding author
Blagrove, Mark
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-22
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
e12697-e12697
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2791077245
Cited by
18
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/I037555/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
REM sleep, dream content, memory consolidation, emotional memory, dream diary, daily diary
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Dreams, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sleep, REM, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review