Cited by 255Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Dreaming of a learning task is associated with enhanced sleep-dependent memory consolidation

Open access
Wamsley, Erin J., Tucker, Matthew, Payne, Jessica D., Benavides, Joseph A., Stickgold, Robert·2010·Current Biology

Abstract

It is now well established that postlearning sleep is beneficial for human memory performance. Meanwhile, human and animal studies have demonstrated that learning-related neural activity is re-expressed during posttraining nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. NREM sleep processes appear to be particularly beneficial for hippocampus-dependent forms of memory. These observations suggest that learning triggers the reactivation and reorganization of memory traces during sleep, a systems-level process that in turn enhances behavioral performance. Here, we hypothesized that dreaming about a learning experience during NREM sleep would be associated with improved performance on a hippocampus-dependent spatial memory task. Subjects were trained on a virtual navigation task and then retested on the same task 5 hr after initial training. Improved performance at retest was strongly associated with task-related dream imagery during an intervening afternoon nap. Task-related thoughts during wakefulness, in contrast, did not predict improved performance. These observations suggest that sleep-dependent memory consolidation in humans is facilitated by the offline reactivation of recently formed memories, and furthermore that dream experiences reflect this memory processing. That similar effects were not observed during wakefulness suggests that these mnemonic processes are specific to the sleep state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.027

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When participants played an emotionally engaging ski computer game, 30% of dreams reported upon awakenings shortly after sleep onset contained elements related to the computer game.

    “When participants played an emotionally engaging ski computer game, 30% of dreams reported upon awakenings (from non-REM sleep stage 1 and 2) shortly after sleep onset contained elements related to the computer game (1304).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1304]

    The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) describes a virtual maze task, not a ski game. It reports that four sleep-group participants (8.0%) mentioned the maze in verbal dream reports; it does not report the claimed 30% figure for dreams after a ski game. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dream contents are often related to waking-life experiences.

    “they are often related to waking-life experiences”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Wamsley et al., 2010

    The Results and Discussion section, “Task-Related Reports are not Veridical Reiterations of the Learning Experience” (page unavailable), describes dreams related to a waking maze task, supporting the basic connection. But the paper reports a specific task-related subset, not that dream contents are often related to waking-life experiences in general. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wamsley, E. J., Tucker, M., Payne, J. D., Benavides, J. A., & Stickgold, R.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Stickgold, Robert
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
850-855
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017588681
Cited by
255
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL 07901, T32HL007901)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH065292, R01-MH 48832, R01MH048832, R01-MH65292)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
sleep-dependent memory consolidation, dreams, NREM sleep, hippocampal-dependent memory, spatial memory, memory reactivation, dream imagery, memory reorganization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Dreams, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep Stages, Maze Learning, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review