Cited by 111Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMemory Processes and InfluencesPsychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Does goal relevant episodic future thinking amplify the effect on delay discounting?

Open access
O'Donnell, Sara, Oluyomi Daniel, Tinuke, Epstein, Leonard H.·2017·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

Delay discounting (DD) is the preference for smaller immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards. Research shows episodic future thinking (EFT), or mentally simulating future experiences, reframes the choice between small immediate and larger delayed rewards, and can reduce DD. Only general EFT has been studied, whereby people reframe decisions in terms of non-goal related future events. Since future thinking is often goal-oriented and leads to greater activation of brain regions involved in prospection, goal-oriented EFT may be associated with greater reductions in DD than general goal-unrelated EFT. The present study (n=104, M age=22.25, SD=3.42; 50% Female) used a between-subjects 2×2 factorial design with type of episodic thinking (Goal, General) and temporal perspective (Episodic future versus recent thinking; EFT vs ERT) as between factors. Results showed a significant reduction in DD for EFT groups (p<0.001, Cohen's d effect size=0.89), and goal-EFT was more effective than general-EFT on reducing DD (p=0.03, d=0.64).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.014

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When people simulate consuming a larger delayed reward, they become more patient and shift toward favoring the more farsighted choice.

    “when people simulate consuming the larger reward, they become more patient and shift to favoring this more farsighted choice (68–70).”

    From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Results report that participants prompted to think about future events discounted delayed monetary rewards less, supporting the shift toward the larger, later choice. But the Methods describe imagining future events, not specifically simulating consumption of the larger reward; that part is more specific than this study supports. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Effects of episodic future thinking on decisions are more pronounced when the simulated event is related to the respective decision.

    “such effects of episodic future thinking are more pronounced when the simulated event is related to the respective decision (e.g., imagining the future moment of buying a computer when making monetary choices or of an upcoming meal when being tempted by readily available snacks; 70–71).”

    From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [70]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Donnell, S., Oluyomi Daniel, T., & Epstein, L. H.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Epstein, Leonard H.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
51
Pages
10-16
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2594806801
Cited by
111
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD080292)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Keywords
delay discounting, episodic future thinking, goal-oriented thinking, time perspective, mental simulation, prospection, decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Reward, Thinking, Young Adult, Delay Discounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review