Cited by 194Mind wandering and attentionMemory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The Neural Basis of Personal Goal Processing When Envisioning Future Events

Open access
D'Argembeau, Arnaud, Stawarczyk, David, Majerus, Steve, Collette, Fabienne, Van der Linden, Martial, Feyers, Dorothée, Maquet, Pierre, Salmon, Eric·2010·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Episodic future thinking allows humans to mentally simulate virtually infinite future possibilities, yet this device is fundamentally goal-directed and should not be equated with fantasizing or wishful thinking. The purpose of this fMRI study was to investigate the neural basis of such goal-directed processing during future-event simulation. Participants were scanned while they imagined future events that were related to their personal goals (personal future events) and future events that were plausible but unrelated to their personal goals (nonpersonal future events). Results showed that imaging personal future events elicited stronger activation in ventral medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) compared to imaging nonpersonal future events. Moreover, these brain activations overlapped with activations elicited by a second task that assessed semantic self-knowledge (i.e., making judgments on one's own personality traits), suggesting that ventral MPFC and PCC mediate self-referential processing across different functional domains. It is suggested that these brain regions may support a collection of processes that evaluate, code, and contextualize the relevance of mental representations with regard to personal goals. The implications of these findings for the understanding of the function instantiated by the default network of the brain are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2009.21314

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When imagining non-personal events, self-schema involvement decreases linearly with psychological closeness to the protagonist, as does engagement of ventromedial prefrontal regions mediating self-schemas.

    “When imagining non-personal events (i.e., events that do not feature the self), the involvement of self-schemas decreases linearly with psychological closeness to the protagonist (de Vito, Gamboz, & Brandimonte, 2012) as does the engagement of ventromedial prefrontal regions mediating self-schemas (e.g., D' Argembeau et al., 2010;Szpunar et al., 2007).”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as D' Argembeau et al., 2010

  • Because non-personal events rely less on self-schema and have reduced complexity, associative strength, elaborateness, and proportional resolution, imagining them is associated with lower activity in many DMN regions relative to imagining personal events.

    “With lower reliance on self-schema, as well as reductions in complexity, associative strength, elaborateness and proportional resolution, it is not surprising that imagining non-personal events is associated with lower activity levels in many DMN regions relative to imagining personal events (including parahippocampal cortex, posterior cingulate, and cuneus; e.g., D' Argembeau et al., 2010;Szpunar”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as D' Argembeau et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brainʼs default network-Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1-38.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Argembeau, A., Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Feyers, D., Maquet, P., & Salmon, E.
Affiliations
  • 1University of Liège, Belgium
  • University of Liège (BE)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2010-08-01
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1701-1713
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2136005653
Cited by
194
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • Université de Liège (06/11-340)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
episodic future thinking, personal goals, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, self-referential processing, default mode network
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Forecasting, Goals, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Psychological Theory, Self Concept, Semantics, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review