Cited by 334Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity

Open access
Epstein, Leonard H., Salvy, Sarah J., Carr, Katelyn A., Dearing, Kelly K., Bickel, Warren K.·2010·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Choice is a central construct in behavioral economics, with choice research divided into choice of concurrent alternative reinforcers, which is conceptualized as relative reinforcing value, or choice of small immediate versus larger delayed rewards, usually of the same commodity, which is conceptualized as delay of gratification and delay discounting. Relative reinforcing value, delay of gratification and delay discounting paradigms can be used to study obesity, which involves strong motivation to obtain and consume food reinforcers. Strong food reinforcement and difficulties in delay of gratification are risk factors for child weight gain, and both are related to individual differences in overweight/obesity. Delay discounting interacts with food reinforcement to predict energy intake. We provide a selective review of research on each of these areas, and argue that the division of choice into reinforcing value versus delay discounting is based on an arbitrary definition based on the temporality of choices. We present a model that integrates reinforcing value and delay discounting approaches. Implications of this theoretical approach to better understand excess energy intake and obesity are discussed. The paper represents an invited review by a symposium, award winner or keynote speaker at the Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior [SSIB] Annual Meeting in Portland, July 2009.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.04.029

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavioral economics is a conceptual system to understand how one's access and exposure predict demand and subsequent intake.

    “The environment in which one resides is a known predictor of consumption behavior (39), thus behavioral economics is a conceptual system to understand how one's access and exposure will predict demand and subsequent intake (40–43).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [60]Hantula DA, Bryant K. Delay discounting determines delivery fees in an Ecommerce economic perspective. Psychol Market 2005; 22: 153– 61.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epstein, L. H., Salvy, S. J., Carr, K. A., Dearing, K. K., & Bickel, W. K.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Epstein, Leonard H.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
438-445
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167093267
Cited by
334
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA024883)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD057190, R03HD056059)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
food reinforcement, delay discounting, delay of gratification, obesity, energy intake, food choice, child weight gain, overweight, impulsivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Food Preferences, Humans, Obesity, Reinforcement, Psychology, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review