Cited by 5Hepatitis C virus researchHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Development and pilot-testing of a cognitive behavioral coping skills group intervention for patients with chronic hepatitis C

Open access
Evon, Donna M., Golin, Carol E., Ruffin, Rachel, Fried, Michael W.·2017·Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Abstract

Psychosocial interventions for patients with chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection are needed to attenuate the impact of extrahepatic symptoms, comorbid conditions, and treatment side effects on HCV health outcomes. We adapted empirically-supported interventions for similar patient populations to develop a Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills group intervention for HCV patients (CBCS-HCV) undergoing treatment. The objectives of this paper are to describe the research activities associated with CBCS-HCV development and pilot testing, including: (1) formative work leading to intervention development; (2) preliminary study protocol; and (3) pilot feasibility testing of the intervention and study design. Formative work included a literature review, qualitative interviews, and adaption, development, and review of study materials. A preliminary study protocol is described. We evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the CBCS-HCV with 12 study participants in Wave 1 testing to examine: (a) feasibility of intervention delivery; (b) patient acceptability; (c) recruitment, enrollment, retention; (d) feasibility of conducting a RCT; (d) therapist protocol fidelity; and (e) feasibility of data collection. Numerous lessons were learned. We found very high rates of data collection, participant attendance, engagement, retention and acceptability, and therapist protocol fidelity. We conclude that many aspects of the CBCS-HCV intervention and study protocol were highly feasible. The greatest challenge during this Wave 1 pilot study was efficiency of participant enrollment due to changes in standard of care treatment. These findings informed two additional waves of pilot testing to examine effect sizes and potential improvements in clinical outcomes, with results forthcoming.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.03.008

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [35]Antoni M. Ironson G. Schneiderman N. Cognitive-behavioral Stress Management 2007 Oxford University Press New York
  2. [36]Evon D.M. Golin C.E. Fried M.W. Keefe F.J. Chronic hepatitis C and antiviral treatment regimens: where can psychology contribute? J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 81 2 2013 361 374 22730952 PMC3504622
  3. [38]Linehan M.M. Skills Training Manual for Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder 1993 Guilford Press New York, NY

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evon, D. M., Golin, C. E., Ruffin, R., & Fried, M. W.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Durham VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Evon, Donna M.
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
6
Pages
85-96
ISSN
2451-8654 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2601896856
Cited by
5
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • University of Miami
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI050410)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK066144, K23DK089004)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K24HD069204)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
chronic hepatitis C, cognitive behavioral therapy, coping strategies, group intervention, psychosocial interventions, intervention development, feasibility testing, patient acceptability, participant retention, therapist fidelity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review