Cited by 50Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

E-Health Program for Patients with Chronic Disease

Marziali, Elsa·2009·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility and benefits of a computer Internet-based videoconferencing healthcare support program for community-dwelling older adults with chronic disease. Eighteen participants (n = 18) who met inclusion criteria were recruited from a community health clinic, provided informed signed consent, and were assigned in groups of six to an Internetbased support group program. Where needed, participants were supplied equipment (computers, Web cams, audio headsets) and trained to access an easy-to-use, password-protected Web site that uses videoconferencing to support group member-facilitator interactive communication. The aim of the intervention was to support group member bonding and sharing of challenges and strategies for managing a chronic disease. Following 10 weekly professionally facilitated sessions, the groups met weekly in a self-help mode for an additional 3 months. Participants were interviewed at 6-month follow-up. An interview guide was used to gain feedback on using the Internet to access a health service and to ask about the benefits of having participated in the videoconferencing support group program. At follow-up, participants responded positively to using technology to communicate with healthcare professionals and other group members. They also valued the information shared regarding self-care, and reported reduction in feelings of loneliness and isolation. Our Internet-based, videoconferencing intervention program can be viewed as a prototype for designing technology platforms for the delivery of professional healthcare services to home-based older adults with chronic disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2008.0082

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marziali, E.
Affiliations
Kunnin Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Corresponding author
Marziali, Elsa
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2009-03
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
176-181
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2040077970
Cited by
50
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
videoconferencing, internet-based health care, chronic disease, older adults, support groups, self-management, self-care, loneliness, social isolation, home care, telemedicine, feasibility
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Self Care, Social Support, Time Factors, Video Recording, Telemedicine, Internet, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review