The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the reward hypothesis: alternative functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dopamine, learning and motivation.
Wise, R. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1406 · Cited by 3,379 · cited 7×
“Conclusions Despite on-going revisions of the DA hypothesis of reward [1 ], there continue to be persistent problems with using the many and varied forms of this hypothesis as a conceptual framework for understanding the behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens DA.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGetting formal with dopamine and reward
Schultz, W. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00967-4 · Cited by 2,574
Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex
Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J., & Everitt, B. J. (2002) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00007-6 · Cited by 2,129
Ikemoto, S., & Panksepp, J. (1999) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00023-5 · Cited by 1,450
Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis
Wise, R. A. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00010372 · Cited by 1,016
Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction
Di Chiara, G. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00286-3 · Cited by 996
Kelley, A. E. (2004) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.11.015 · Cited by 942
Impulsive choice induced in rats by lesions of the nucleus accumbens core
Cardinal, R. N., Pennicott, D. R., Lakmali, C., Sugathapala, Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060818 · Cited by 923
Salamone, J. D., & Correa, M. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00282-6 · Cited by 817
Self-citationPENNARTZ, C., GROENEWEGEN, H., & LOPESDASILVA, F. (1994) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(94)90025-6 · Cited by 811
Cited by
The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000446 · Cited by 2,320
“…and specific way, although there is evidence against Buck’s assertion that specific neurochemicals correspond to “primary affects” (e.g., see Berridge & Robinson 1998; Horvitz 2000; 2002; Salamone et al. 2005; 2007; 2009; Schultz et al. 1993; Wise 2005; for a review, see Barrett et al. 2007a).”
BackgroundThe debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience
Berridge, K. C. (2007) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x · Cited by 2,347
Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning
Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E., & Aldridge, J. W. (2009) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014 · Cited by 1,942
Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: Lessons from translational neuroscience
Treadway, M. T., & Zald, D. H. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006 · Cited by 1,579
Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare
Boissy, A., Manteuffel, G., Jensen, M. B., Moe, R. O., Spruijt, B., Keeling, L. J., Winckler, C., Forkman, B., Dimitrov, I., Langbein, J., et al. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003 · Cited by 1,486
Metadata
- Authors
- Salamone, J., Correa, M., Mingote, S., & Weber, S.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-41
- ISSN
- 1471-4892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966891940
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the reward hypothesis: alternative functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.coph.2004.09.004
- The paper
- Salamone, J., Correa, M., Mingote, S., & Weber, S. (2005). Beyond the reward hypothesis: alternative functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2004.09.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
