The Potential Public Health Relevance of Social Isolation and Loneliness: Prevalence, Epidemiology, and Risk Factors
Abstract
This article is a revised and updated version of testimony presented to the U.S. Senate Aging Committee on April 27, 2017. Our social relationships are widely considered crucial to emotional well-being; however, the possibility that social connection may be a biological need, vital to physical well-being and even survival, is commonly unrecognized. Still, extreme examples clearly illustrate infants in custodial care who lack human contact fail to thrive and often die (UNICEF, 1997), and social isolation is so distressing that solitary confinement has been used as a form of punishment and even torture. Yet an increasing portion of the U.S. population now experiences isolation regularly. News headlines from many nations, including the United States, Germany, Australia, and the United Kingdom, suggest that we are facing a loneliness epidemic (http://www.campaigntoendloneliness.org/loneliness-research, http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/germany-faces-epidemic-of-lonely-and-isolated-seniors-a-876635.html, https://startsat60.com/health/new-survey-reveals-australias-loneliness-epidemic, http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/tania-de-jong/loneliness-is-the-global-epidemic-of-our-times), leading to the important question of whether there is evidence to support such a claim and, if so, whether we are facing a public health crisis. Recently my work has systematically examined and summarized the available evidence supporting the public health prioritization of social connections (Holt-Lunstad, Robles, & Sbarra, 2017). Here I will summarize data on prevalence rates, epidemiological evidence of risk, and potential risk factors. According to one estimate, more than eight million older adults are affected by isolation (AARP, n.d.). However, this prevalence estimate is likely a conservative estimate given it is restricted to a specific age range and a narrow definition of social disconnection. Social isolation and loneliness are distinct experiences, but both are characterized by a lack of social connection. When we consider social connection more broadly, as a multi-dimensional construct (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2017)—including the extent to which relationships are present in our lives (e.g., structural aspects of relationships), the extent others can be relied upon (e.g., functional aspects of relationships), and our satisfaction with them (e.g., quality of relationships)—the prevalence of U.S. adults lacking social connection may be much larger. A precise estimate of the prevalence of adults in the United States that lack social connection is difficult, given that assessments are not currently systematically and routinely collected. However, some demographic characteristics that are indicators of social disconnection are routinely collected as part of census data. These data show that over a quarter of the U.S. population, and 28% of older adults, live alone (Vespa et al., 2013). More than half the U.S. adult population is unmarried, of which 20% have never married (Vespa et al., 2013). Further, approximately 40% of first marriages and 70% of remarriages end in divorce (United States Census Bureau, 2011). While such demographics are relatively crude indicators of social disconnection (e.g., someone who is single or lives alone may still have a wide social network) they are nonetheless robust predictors of health outcomes and thus should still be taken seriously. Data collected from nationally representative samples provide additional estimates of social disconnection that go beyond demographics. For example, more than one third of adults over age 45 report being lonely (Wilson & Moulton, 2010), equating to over 42 million older adults who experience chronic loneliness. Even among those who are married, over 30% of relationships are severely discordant (Whisman, Beach, & Snyder, 2008). Further, the majority of American adults do not participate in any kind of social group (Pew Research Center, 2009). Less than half of adults participate in a local religious group, and less than a quarter of adults participate in a social club, community group, sports league, or other local group (Pew Research Center, 2009). Taken together, these data suggest that a significant portion of the population, and older adults in particular, may be socially isolated/disconnected. Is there evidence that social isolation, loneliness, and relationship distress are increasing? In other words, are we becoming more socially disconnected? To address this question, we can look to these different sources of data to determine whether isolation (or social disconnection) is increasing to determine the degree of urgency of addressing this issue. For example, the average household size has decreased and there has been a 10% increase in those living alone (United States Census Bureau, 2011). The number of single occupancy households worldwide is now greater than ever in recorded history (Euromonitor International, 2014). Further demographic trends show reduct
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social isolation poses health risks comparable to smoking and obesity.
“Holt-Lunstad et al. [116] found that social isolation poses health risks comparable to smoking and obesity”
From The Power of Environment: A Comprehensive Review of the Exposome's Role in Healthy Aging, Longevity, and Preventive Medicine-Lessons from Blue Zones and Cilento (2025) · cites this paper as [116]
The present study results are consistent with previous studies that underline the central role of loneliness and social connections in health.
“These findings are consistent with previous studies that underline the central role of loneliness and social connections in health [48,49].”
From Gender Differences in Psychological Stress Factors of Physical Therapy Degree Students in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
Cites
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 · Cited by 7,272 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Evidence from 148 independent prospective studies, including more than 300,000 participants, revealed that greater social connection is associated with a 50% reduced risk of early death (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationLoneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568352 · Cited by 6,043 · see citing works
Self-citationFlegal, K. M., Kit, B. K., Orpana, H., & Graubard, B. I. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.113905 · Cited by 3,998 · see citing works
Uchino, B. N. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9056-5 · Cited by 2,507 · see citing works
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9 · Cited by 2,169 · see citing works
Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis.
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207 · Cited by 2,107 · see citing works
Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis.
Wrzus, C., Hänel, M., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028601 · Cited by 1,389 · see citing works
Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States.
Holt-Lunstad, J., Robles, T. F., & Sbarra, D. A. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000103 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span
Yang, Y. C., Boen, C., Gerken, K., Li, T., Schorpp, K., & Harris, K. M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1511085112 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
The physiology of marriage: pathways to health.
Robles, T. F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00160-4 · Cited by 748 · see citing works
Hostinar, C. E., Sullivan, R. M., & Gunnar, M. R. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0032671 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Changes in Older Adult Loneliness
Dykstra, P. A., van Tilburg, T. G., & Gierveld, J. D. J. (2005) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027505279712 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Social isolation and loneliness: Prospective associations with functional status in older adults.
Shankar, A., McMunn, A., Demakakos, P., Hamer, M., & Steptoe, A. (2016) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000437 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Older adults reporting social isolation or loneliness show poorer cognitive function 4 years later
Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2013) · Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1136/eb-2013-101379 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Meta-analysis of marital dissolution and mortality: Reevaluating the intersection of gender and age
Shor, E., Roelfs, D. J., Bugyi, P., & Schwartz, J. E. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.010 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Whisman, M., Beach, S., & Snyder, D. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.5.745 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Social contact frequency and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
Shor, E., & Roelfs, D. J. (2015) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.010 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Rook, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407509105525 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
The Rising Relative Risk of Mortality for Singles: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
Roelfs, D. J., Shor, E., Kalish, R., & Yogev, T. (2011) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwr111 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Children at risk in Central and Eastern Europe : perils and promises
Harwin, J. (1997) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19
Luchetti, M., Lee, J. H., Aschwanden, D., Sesker, A., Strickhouser, J. E., Terracciano, A., & Sutin, A. R. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000690 · Cited by 903 · see citing works
Aknin, L. B., De Neve, J.-E., Dunn, E. W., Fancourt, D. E., Goldberg, E., Helliwell, J. F., Jones, S. P., Karam, E., Layard, R., Lyubomirsky, S., et al. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211029964 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Christiansen, J., Qualter, P., Friis, K., Pedersen, S., Lund, R., Andersen, C., Bekker-Jeppesen, M., & Lasgaard, M. (2021) · Perspectives in Public Health · doi:10.1177/17579139211016077 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., Jetten, J., Bentley, S. V., Fong, P., & Steffens, N. K. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.013 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Loneliness among people with substance use problems: A narrative systematic review
Ingram, I., Kelly, P. J., Deane, F. P., Baker, A. L., Goh, M. C. W., Raftery, D. K., & Dingle, G. A. (2020) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.13064 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Loneliness across time and space
Luhmann, M., Buecker, S., & Rüsberg, M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00124-1 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Teo, R. H., Cheng, W. H., Cheng, L. J., Lau, Y., & Lau, S. T. (2023) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2022.104904 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
The Impact of Loneliness and Social Isolation on Cognitive Aging: A Narrative Review
Guarnera, J., Yuen, E., & Macpherson, H. (2023) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports · doi:10.3233/adr-230011 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
“To combat the ‘loneliness epidemic’ [20, 21, 24],”
BackgroundPrevalence and Social Inequality in Youth Loneliness in the UK
Qualter, P., Hennessey, A., Yang, K., Chester, K. L., Klemera, E., & Brooks, F. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph181910420 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Bermejo-Franco, A., Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L., Gaviña-Barroso, M. I., Atienza-Carbonell, B., Balanzá-Martínez, V., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19020810 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“These findings are consistent with previous studies that underline the central role of loneliness and social connections in health [48,49].”
ResultSeaborn, K., Sekiguchi, T., Tokunaga, S., Miyake, N. P., & Otake-Matsuura, M. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-022-00925-7 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Jeste, D. V., Di Somma, S., Lee, E. E., Nguyen, T. T., Scalcione, M., Biaggi, A., Daly, R., Liu, J., Tu, X., Ziedonis, D., et al. (2021) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2020.1821170 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Aliberti, S. M., & Capunzo, M. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17040722 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Holt-Lunstad et al. [116] found that social isolation poses health risks comparable to smoking and obesity, reinforcing the importance of fostering social connections in aging populations.”
Thompson, K. N., Odgers, C. L., Bryan, B. T., Danese, A., Milne, B. J., Strange, L., Matthews, T., & Arseneault, L. (2022) · JCPP Advances · doi:10.1002/jcv2.12073 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Bryan, B. T., Thompson, K. N., Fisher, H. L., Matthews, T., Milne, B., & Arseneault, L. (2026) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579426101758 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Holt-Lunstad, J.
- Venue
- Public Policy & Aging Report
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 127-130
- ISSN
- 1055-3037 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-4892
- OpenAlex
- W2782455446
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 26.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Policy & Aging Report (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Keywords
- social isolation, loneliness, social connectedness, public health, older adults, prevalence, risk factors, interpersonal relationships, physical health, mental health, social determinants of health, social disconnection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review