Cited by 1,472Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMedia Influence and HealthAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives

Kuntsche, Emmanuel, Knibbe, Ronald, Gmel, Gerhard, Engels, Rutger·2005·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

This article reviews evidence of adolescent and young adult drinking motives and their relation to possible consequences over the last 15 years. To this end, a computer-assisted search of relevant articles was conducted. Results revealed that most young people reported drinking for social motives, some indicated enhancement motives, and only a few reported coping motives. Social motives appear to be associated with moderate alcohol use, enhancement with heavy drinking, and coping motives with alcohol-related problems. However, an enormous heterogeneity was found in terms of how motives were measured: 10 to 40 items were grouped into between 2 and 10 dimensions and sometimes the same items occurred under different dimensions. Future studies should therefore use well-defined, theoretically based, homogenous instruments to disentangle cultural from measurement differences across surveys.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.06.002

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggressive individuals often display distinctive motivational patterns for drinking, tending to use alcohol as a means to reduce frustration, restore perceived control, or escape negative affect.

    “Moreover, aggressive individuals often display distinctive motivational patterns for drinking, tending to use alcohol as a means to reduce frustration, restore perceived control, or escape negative affect (Bushman and Cooper 1990; Kuntsche et al. 2005; Cooper et al. 2008, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuntsche, E., Knibbe, R., Gmel, G., & Engels, R.
Affiliations
  • Addiction Switzerland (CH)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Kuntsche, Emmanuel
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
841-861
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037954991
Cited by
1,472
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 63
FWCI
10.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
drinking motives, adolescent alcohol use, young adult drinking, social motives, enhancement motives, coping motives, heavy drinking, alcohol-related problems, measurement heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Personality, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Social Adjustment, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review