Cited by 123Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Mobile technology-based interventions for adult users of alcohol: a systematic review of the literature

Fowler, Lauren A., Holt, Sidney L., Joshi, Deepti·2016·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Background Worldwide, 16% of people aged 15 and older engage in harmful use of alcohol. Harmful alcohol use leads to a host of preventable negative social and health consequences. Mobile technology-based interventions provide a particularly promising avenue for the widespread and cost-effective delivery of treatment that is accessible, affordable, individualized, and destigmatized to both alcohol-dependent and nondependent individuals.Aims The present review sought to summarize the current literature on mobile technology-based interventions among adult users of alcohol and determine the efficacy of such interventions.Methods Five databases were searched in December 2015 (Jan. 2004-Dec. 2015). Inclusion criteria were: participants aged 18 or older, interventions delivered through mobile-technology, and outcome measurement of alcohol reduction/cessation.Findings Eight studies met inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies reviewed found positive effects of the intervention, even though the interventions themselves varied in design, length, dosage, and target population, and were pilot or preliminary in nature.Conclusions Findings from this review highlight the promising, yet preliminary state of research in this area. Studies with adequate power and valid design are necessary to evaluate the potential of mobile technology-based interventions on long-term alcohol behavior outcomes. Furthermore, future research should elucidate what the most effective length of time is for a mobile technology-based intervention, how often individuals should receive messages for maximum benefit, and determine the comparative effectiveness of mobile technology interventions with other efficacious interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.008

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fowler, L. A., Holt, S. L., & Joshi, D.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Fowler, Lauren A.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
62
Pages
25-34
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2417793379
Cited by
123
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mobile health, hazardous drinking, alcohol cessation, alcohol consumption reduction, alcoholism, intervention efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcoholism, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Point-of-Care Systems, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review