Cited by 288Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Perceived triggers of primary headache disorders: A meta-analysis

Open access
Pellegrino, A Brooke Walters, Davis-Martin, Rachel E, Houle, Timothy T, Turner, Dana P, Smitherman, Todd A·2018·Cephalalgia

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively synthesize extant literature on perceived triggers of primary headache disorders. Methods: A meta-analytic review of headache trigger survey studies was conducted. Endorsement rates, assessment method, and headache and sample characteristics were extracted from included articles. Separate random-effects models were used to assess trigger endorsement rates and post-hoc meta-regressions examined potential moderator variables. Results: 85 articles from 1958 to 2015 were included, involving 27,122 participants and querying 420 unique triggers (collapsed into 15 categories). Four-fifths (0.81; 95% CI .75 to .86) of individuals with migraine or tension-type headache endorsed at least one trigger. Rates increased with the number of categories queried (OR: 1.18, 1.08–1.30) and year of publication (OR: 1.04, 1.00–1.08). The triggers most commonly endorsed were stress (.58, .53–.63) and sleep (.41, .36–.47). Conclusions: Extreme heterogeneity characterizes the headache trigger literature. Most individuals with a primary headache disorder perceive their attacks to be triggered by one or more precipitants, the most common of which are stress and sleep. However, trigger endorsement is influenced by method of assessment. Enhancing methodological consistency and prioritizing experimental studies would improve our understanding of headache triggers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0333102417727535

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional distress is regarded as the most important trigger in migraine attacks.

    “since emotional distress is regarded as the most important trigger in migraine attacks (6).”

    From Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for the Prophylaxis of Migraine in Adults: A Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion says stress is the most common perceived headache trigger, which supports the claim’s central point. But the meta-analysis covers migraine and tension-type headache together, and it measures how often triggers are endorsed—not whether emotional distress is the most important trigger specifically for migraine attacks. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interoceptive awareness localizes to the insula, a brain area considered a hub of activity in migraine that plays a key role in integrating sensory, autonomic, cognitive, and emotional processes.

    “Interoceptive awareness localizes to the insula,39 an area of the brain considered a “hub of activity” in migraine, playing a key role in integrating many of the dynamic processes of migraine (sensory, autonomic, cognitive, and emotional).40”

    From Mechanisms of mindfulness in patients with migraine: Results of a qualitative study. (2023) · cites this paper as [40]

    Citation 40 is attached to the claim that the insula is a migraine activity hub integrating sensory, autonomic, cognitive, and emotional processes. The Introduction and Discussion address migraine stimuli, perceived triggers, and stress-related autonomic effects, but our copy does not address the insula or its proposed integrative role. Searches for the insula, interoceptive awareness, and the stated processes found no relevant passage; citation 39, not this source, is attached to the separate localization claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pellegrino, A. B. W., Davis-Martin, R. E., Houle, T. T., Turner, D. P., & Smitherman, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Hartford HealthCare Headache Center, West Hartford, CT, USA
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Smitherman, Todd A
Venue
Cephalalgia
Published
2017-08-20
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
1188-1198
ISSN
  • 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2982
OpenAlex
W2746815301
Cited by
288
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cephalalgia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS065257)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
headache triggers, primary headache, migraine, tension-type headache, stress, sleep
MeSH terms
Humans, Headache Disorders, Primary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review