CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 308Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of affective dysregulation in drug addiction

Cheetham, Ali, Allen, Nicholas B., Yücel, Murat, Lubman, Dan I.·2010·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although affective and substance use disorders frequently co-occur, the role of affective dysregulation in addiction is often overlooked. This paper reviews the role of affective dysregulation in the initiation and maintenance of substance use disorders (SUDs), presenting evidence for a relationship between SUD and three biologically-based dimensions of affective temperament and behaviour: negative affect (NA), positive affect (PA), and effortful control (EC). High NA, low EC, and both high and low PA were each found to play a role in conferring risk and maintaining substance use behaviours, although the strength of their influence differed depending on stage of illness (i.e., early onset use through to addiction). Given these findings, we argue that future research should explicitly consider how changes within affective systems may underlie the development of SUDs. A better understanding of the role of affective dysregulation in addiction will aid in clarifying how risk is conferred, as well as how addictive behaviours are maintained, thereby informing the development of preventative strategies and novel treatments. Future studies should continue to examine the role of high NA in SUDs, and further examine the respective roles of high PA, low PA, and low EC, as well as identifying the affective characteristics that predispose high-risk individuals to later substance use problems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.005

Cites

179 of 179 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 180 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 308

Related

Metadata

Authors
Cheetham, A., Allen, N. B., Yücel, M., & Lubman, D. I.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Lubman, Dan I.
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
621-634
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.005
OpenAlex
W1977593884
Cited by
308
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotional dysregulation, substance use disorders, drug addiction, affective temperament, negative affect, positive affect, effortful control, addiction risk, early onset of substance use, prevention
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Emotions, Humans, Temperament, Behavior, Addictive, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review