Cited by 184Attachment and Relationship DynamicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Social support and social negativity findings in depression: perceived responsiveness to basic psychological needs

Ibarra-Rovillard, M. Sol, Kuiper, Nicholas A.·2011·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Social relationships can influence the well-being of depressed individuals, both positively and negatively. However, processes underlying these diverse effects are not clear. Drawing from self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), we propose that the extent to which social relationship partners are perceived to fulfill or undermine basic psychological needs serves to explain both the positive and negative effects that social relationships have on the well-being of depressed individuals. This proposal forms a major tenet of a model that integrates previous models of social support mechanisms, namely, the buffering hypothesis and the main effects hypothesis. This model thus explains both the positive and negative effects that social relationships have on the well-being of depressed individuals. Presentation of this model is followed by a discussion of the possible effects of two characteristics of depressed individuals (i.e., stress generation and negative cognitive style) on their perceptions of relationship partners' responsiveness to basic psychological needs. We conclude with suggestions for future research and possible clinical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.01.005

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibarra-Rovillard, M. S., & Kuiper, N. A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Ibarra-Rovillard, M. Sol
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
342-352
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052117850
Cited by
184
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
depression, social support, basic psychological needs, self-determination theory, perceived responsiveness, interpersonal relationships, buffering hypothesis, stress generation, negative cognitive style, well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Social Behavior, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review