Cited by 674Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Stress generation in depression: Reflections on origins, research, and future directions

Hammen, Constance·2006·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Depressed individuals report higher rates of stressful life events, especially those that have occurred in part because of the person's characteristics and behaviors affecting interpersonal interactions. Termed stress generation , this phenomenon draws attention to the role of the individual as an active contributor rather than passive player in his or her environment, and is therefore an example of action theory. In this article, the author speculates about the intellectual origins of her stress generation perspective, and notes somewhat similar transactional approaches to the stress‐disorder link outside of depression research. The literature on stress generation in depression is reviewed, including studies that attempt to explore its correlates and predictors, covering clinical, contextual, family, genetic, cognitive, interpersonal, and personality variables. Empirical and conceptual gaps in our understanding of processes contributing to stressors in the lives of depressed people remain. The author concludes with suggestions for further research, with the goal of furthering understanding both of mechanisms of depression and of dysfunctional interpersonal processes, as well as development of effective interventions to help break the stress‐recurrence cycle of depression. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 62: 1065–1082, 2006.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.20293

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammen, C.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Hammen, Constance
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-29
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
1065-1082
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W1968791579
Cited by
674
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 44
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
stress generation, depression, life events, philosophy of action, interpersonal processes, predictors of stress, family factors, genetic factors, cognitive factors, personality, depression mechanisms, depression intervention
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Disease Susceptibility, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Psychological Theory, Stress, Psychological, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review