Cited by 146Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The trauma of psychosis: Posttraumatic stress disorder and recent onset psychosis

Mueser, Kim T., Lu, Weili, Rosenberg, Stanley D., Wolfe, Rosemarie·2010·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Clinical investigators have argued that the experience of a recent onset of psychosis is an event of such severity that it can lead to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or at least to PTSD symptoms. The traumagenic elements of the psychotic experience may relate to the distressing nature of psychotic symptoms, components of treatment, or both. However, this hypotheses has not been fully empirically evaluated. In particular, the importance of the DSM-IV A1 (perception of threat) and A2 (negative emotion at time of event) criteria for a traumatic event due to a psychotic episode has not been assessed. To address this question, 38 clients in treatment for recent onset of psychosis were interviewed to identify distressing experiences related to the episode, with PTSD assessed (including A1/A2 criteria) related to those events. More than one-half of the participants reported intense distress related to psychotic symptoms or treatment experiences, with 66% meeting symptom criteria for the PTSD syndrome (regardless of A1/A2), and 39% meeting full diagnostic criteria for PTSD (including A1/A2). Both participants with the PTSD syndrome and full PTSD reported more problems in daily functioning and more severe symptoms than those without PTSD. Participants with the PTSD syndrome were also more likely to have an integrative rather than sealing over coping style compared to those without the PTSD syndrome. The results suggest that individuals with PTSD symptoms related to a recent onset of psychosis may benefit from intervention designed to help them integrate their experience into their lives and address potentially stigmatizing beliefs that could contribute to distress and impaired functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2009.10.025

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueser, K. T., Lu, W., Rosenberg, S. D., & Wolfe, R.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
116
Issue
2-3
Pages
217-227
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036592505
Cited by
146
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Dartmouth College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, recent-onset psychosis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Chi-Square Distribution, Age of Onset, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review