Cited by 118Schizophrenia research and treatmentChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Early trauma may increase the risk for psychotic experiences by impacting on emotional response and perception of control

Open access
Bak, M., Krabbendam, L., Janssen, I., de Graaf, R., Vollebergh, W., van Os, J.·2005·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: Exposure to early trauma may increase the risk of dysfunctional responses to anomalous psychotic experiences resulting in psychotic symptom formation. Method: In a three‐wave longitudinal general population study, 4045 never‐psychotic individuals exposed and non‐exposed to trauma before the age of 16 years, according to baseline interview were interviewed for the onset of psychotic experiences 3 years later (T2). In 36 individuals with incident psychosis at T2, assessments were made, for each psychotic experience, of i) the amount of distress associated with and ii) the degree of coping and subjective control over the experience. Results: In the 16 observations of an incident psychotic experience, in the absence of distress, the baseline rate of early trauma was low (6%), whereas it was much higher in the 21 observations of an incident psychotic experience with distress [43%; odds ratio = 10.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 96.3; P = 0.046]. Similarly, coping attempts in the context of early trauma was associated with less control (reduction of 2 points on a seven‐point scale, 95% CI: −4.0, −0.07). Conclusion: Early experience of trauma may create lasting cognitive and affective vulnerabilities to develop clinical symptoms arising out of early, non‐clinical psychotic experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00646.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychosis itself can function as an adverse event for individuals with psychotic disorders.

    “several studies have suggested that psychosis itself can function as an AE for individuals with PDs [5–8], resulting in similarly poor outcomes.”

    From Outcomes of an adapted prolonged exposure psychotherapy for people with early phase psychosis, substance misuse, and a history of adversity: the PE + trial (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction and Trauma and distress sections examine whether early trauma is associated with distress during psychotic experiences in a general-population sample. They do not say that psychosis itself functions as an adverse event for people with psychotic disorders or that it leads to similarly poor outcomes. I searched for psychosis as a traumatic or adverse event and for outcomes attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Spauwen J, Krabbendam L, Lieb R, Wittchen HU, van Os J. Impact of psychological trauma on the trajectory of psy- chosis liability. Br J Psychiatry (in press).
  2. Jackson C, Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P. Sealing-over: a psychological defence against the trauma of early psychosis? In: Mordentoft M, McGorry P, eds. Third International Conference on early psychosis. 25-28 Sep- tember. Copenhagen, Denmark: Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2002;106:50
  3. Wing JK, Cooper JE, Sartorius N. The measurement and classificatoin of psychiatric symptoms. London: Cam- bridge University Press, 1974.
  4. Bak M. Coping matters with psychosis. Bleuler's right. PhD Thesis, pp 43-55. Maastricht: Maastricht University, 2004.
  5. Ormel J. Moeite met Leven of een Moeilijk Leven? PhD Thesis, Groningen, University Press Groningen. 1980.
  6. Hall FS, Wilkinson LS, Humby T, Robbins TW. Maternal deprivation of neonatal rats produces enduring changes in dopamine function. Synapse 1999;32:37-43.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bak, M., Krabbendam, L., Janssen, I., de Graaf, R., Vollebergh, W., & van Os, J.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Bak, M.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-12
Volume
112
Issue
5
Pages
360-366
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2152217001
Cited by
118
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
early childhood trauma, psychotic experiences, transition to psychosis, emotional distress, coping, perceived control, psychosis vulnerability, anomalous experiences, emotional vulnerability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Perception, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Wounds and Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review