The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The current understanding of KRAS protein structure and dynamics
Open accessAbstract
One of the most common drivers in human cancer is the mutant KRAS protein. Not so long ago KRAS was considered as an undruggable oncoprotein. After a long struggle, however, we finally see some light at the end of the tunnel as promising KRAS targeted therapies are in or approaching clinical trials. In recent years, together with the promising progress in RAS drug discovery, our understanding of KRAS has increased tremendously. This progress has been accompanied with a resurgence of publicly available KRAS structures, which were limited to nine structures less than ten years ago. Furthermore, the ever-increasing computational capacity has made biologically relevant timescales accessible, enabling molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study the dynamics of KRAS protein in more detail at the atomistic level. In this minireview, my aim is to provide the reader an overview of the publicly available KRAS structural data, insights to conformational dynamics revealed by experiments and what we have learned from MD simulations. Also, I will discuss limitations of the current data and provide suggestions for future research related to KRAS, which would fill out the existing gaps in our knowledge and provide guidance in deciphering this enigmatic oncoprotein.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walker, J. E., Saraste, M., Runswick, M. J., & Gay, N. J. (1982) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01276.x · Cited by 5,312
K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions
Ostrem, J. M., Peters, U., Sos, M. L., Wells, J. A., & Shokat, K. M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12796 · Cited by 2,557
Dynamic personalities of proteins
Henzler-Wildman, K., & Kern, D. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06522 · Cited by 2,545
COSMIC: mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer
Forbes, S. A., Bindal, N., Bamford, S., Cole, C., Kok, C. Y., Beare, D., Jia, M., Shepherd, R., Leung, K., Menzies, A., et al. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq929 · Cited by 2,278
The Clinical KRAS(G12C) Inhibitor AMG 510 Drives Anti-Tumour Immunity
Canon, J., Rex, K., Saiki, A. Y., Mohr, C., Cooke, K., Bagal, D., Gaida, K., Holt, T., Knutson, C. G., Koppada, N., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1694-1 · Cited by 2,277
The P-loop — a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins
Saraste, M., Sibbald, P. R., & Wittinghofer, A. (1990) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/0968-0004(90)90281-f · Cited by 2,056
RAS Proteins and Their Regulators in Human Disease
Simanshu, D. K., Nissley, D. V., & McCormick, F. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009 · Cited by 1,943
GEFs and GAPs: Critical Elements in the Control of Small G Proteins
Bos, J. L., Rehmann, H., & Wittinghofer, A. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.018 · Cited by 1,903
The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding Switch in Three Dimensions
Vetter, I. R., & Wittinghofer, A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062023 · Cited by 1,875
Yeh, I.-C., & Hummer, G. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0477147 · Cited by 1,522
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Rapp C.S. and Pollack R.M.: Crystal packing effects on protein loops. Proteins 2005; 60: 103. · doi:10.1002/prot.20492
- Grossfield A., Patrone P.N., Roe D.R., Schultz A.J., Siderius D.W. and Zuckerman D.M.: Best practices for quantification of uncertainty and sampling quality in molecular simulations [Article v1.0]. Living J Comput Mol Sci 2018; 1.
- Vögele M., Köfinger J. and Hummer G.: Finite-size-corrected rotational diffusion coefficients of membrane proteins and carbon nanotubes from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 2019; 123: 5099. · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b01656
Cited by
Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development
Salo-Ahen, O. M. H., Alanko, I., Bhadane, R., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Honorato, R. V., Hossain, S., Juffer, A. H., Kabedev, A., Lahtela-Kakkonen, M., Larsen, A. S., et al. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9010071 · Cited by 659
Self-citationThe current state of the art and future trends in RAS-targeted cancer therapies
Punekar, S. R., Velcheti, V., Neel, B. G., & Wong, K.-K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-022-00671-9 · Cited by 549
A deep catalogue of protein-coding variation in 983,578 individuals
Sun, K. Y., Bai, X., Chen, S., Bao, S., Zhang, C., Kapoor, M., Backman, J., Joseph, T., Maxwell, E., Mitra, G., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07556-0 · Cited by 127
Issahaku, A. R., Mukelabai, N., Agoni, C., Rudrapal, M., Aldosari, S. M., Almalki, S. G., & Khan, J. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22668-1 · Cited by 93
Johnson, C. W., Lin, Y.-J., Reid, D., Parker, J., Pavlopoulos, S., Dischinger, P., Graveel, C., Aguirre, A. J., Steensma, M., Haigis, K. M., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.026 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Pantsar, T.
- Venue
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 189-198
- ISSN
- 2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2998581726
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 114
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The current understanding of KRAS protein structure and dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.004
- The paper
- Pantsar, T. (2020). The current understanding of KRAS protein structure and dynamics. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
