Cited by 286Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionMotor Control and Adaptation

Learning Strengthens the Response of Primary Visual Cortex to Simple Patterns

Open access
Furmanski, Christopher S, Schluppeck, Denis, Engel, Stephen A·2004·Current Biology

Abstract

Training can significantly improve performance on even the most basic visual tasks, such as detecting a faint patch of light or determining the orientation of a bar (for reviews, see ). The neural mechanisms of visual learning, however, remain controversial. One simple way to improve behavior is to increase the overall neural response to the trained stimulus by increasing the number or gain of responsive neurons. Learning of this type has been observed in other sensory modalities, where training increases the number of receptive fields that cover the trained stimulus. Here, we show that visual learning can selectively increase the overall response to trained stimuli in primary visual cortex (V1). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure neural signals before and after one month of practice at detecting very low-contrast oriented patterns. Training increased V1 response for practiced orientations relative to control orientations by an average of 39%, and the magnitude of the change in V1 correlated moderately well with the magnitude of changes in detection performance. The elevation of V1 activity by training likely results from an increase in the number of neurons responding to the trained stimulus or an increase in response gain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.032

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furmanski, C. S., Schluppeck, D., & Engel, S. A.
Affiliations
  • HRL Laboratories (United States) (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Engel, Stephen A
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
573-578
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000089180
Cited by
286
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (EY11862)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
visual learning, primary visual cortex, orientation discrimination, perceptual training, visual cortex plasticity
MeSH terms
Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review