The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rhythmic Sampling within and between Objects despite Sustained Attention at a Cued Location
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY The brain directs its limited processing resources through various selection mechanisms, broadly referred to as attention. The present study investigated the temporal dynamics of two such selection mechanisms: space- and object-based selection. Previous evidence has demonstrated that preferential processing resulting from a spatial cue (i.e., space-based selection) spreads to uncued locations, if those locations are part of the same object (i.e., resulting in object-based selection). But little is known about the relationship between these fundamental selection mechanisms. Here, we used human behavioral data to determine how space- and object-based selection simultaneously evolve under conditions that promote sustained attention at a cued location, varying the cue-to-target interval from 300—1100 ms. We tracked visual-target detection at a cued location (i.e., space-based selection), at an uncued location that was part of the same object (i.e., object-based selection), and at an uncued location that was part of a different object (i.e., in the absence of space- and object-based selection). The data demonstrate that even under static conditions, there is a moment-to-moment reweighting of attentional priorities based on object properties. This reweighting is revealed through rhythmic patterns of visual-target detection both within (at 8 Hz) and between (at 4 Hz) objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“Perhaps the best understood of these mechanisms, space-based selection, can bias the brain’s limited processing resources toward stimuli that occur at a behaviorally relevant location [1].”
A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.
Fries, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011 · Cited by 4,284
Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals
Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::aid-hbm4>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 3,798
Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention
Fries, P., Reynolds, J. H., Rorie, A. E., & Desimone, R. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1055465 · Cited by 2,786
Rayner, K. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210902816461 · Cited by 2,682
Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices
Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138071 · Cited by 2,380
Selective attention and the organization of visual information.
Duncan, J. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.113.4.501 · Cited by 1,990
Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154735 · Cited by 1,719
Detection ofn:mPhase Locking from Noisy Data: Application to Magnetoencephalography
Tass, P., Rosenblum, M. G., Weule, J., Kurths, J., Pikovsky, A., Volkmann, J., Schnitzler, A., & Freund, H.-J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3291 · Cited by 1,362
Cited by
Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence
Fries, P. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034 · Cited by 2,725
Brain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom
Dikker, S., Wan, L., Davidesco, I., Kaggen, L., Oostrik, M., McClintock, J., Rowland, J., Michalareas, G., Van Bavel, J. J., Ding, M., et al. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.002 · Cited by 871
A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment
Lakatos, P., Gross, J., & Thut, G. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.075 · Cited by 508
A Rhythmic Theory of Attention
Fiebelkorn, I. C., & Kastner, S. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.009 · Cited by 478
Self-citationNeural Mechanisms of Sustained Attention Are Rhythmic
Helfrich, R. F., Fiebelkorn, I. C., Szczepanski, S. M., Lin, J. J., Parvizi, J., Knight, R. T., & Kastner, S. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.032 · Cited by 447
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiebelkorn, I. C., Saalmann, Y. B., & Kastner, S.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2553-2558
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118852700
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhythmic Sampling within and between Objects despite Sustained Attention at a Cued Location. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.063
- The paper
- Fiebelkorn, I. C., Saalmann, Y. B., & Kastner, S. (2013). Rhythmic Sampling within and between Objects despite Sustained Attention at a Cued Location. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
