The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frontal Top-Down Signals Increase Coupling of Auditory Low-Frequency Oscillations to Continuous Speech in Human Listeners
Open accessAbstract
Humans show a remarkable ability to understand continuous speech even under adverse listening conditions. This ability critically relies on dynamically updated predictions of incoming sensory information, but exactly how top-down predictions improve speech processing is still unclear. Brain oscillations are a likely mechanism for these top-down predictions [1, 2]. Quasi-rhythmic components in speech are known to entrain low-frequency oscillations in auditory areas [3, 4], and this entrainment increases with intelligibility [5]. We hypothesize that top-down signals from frontal brain areas causally modulate the phase of brain oscillations in auditory cortex. We use magnetoencephalography (MEG) to monitor brain oscillations in 22 participants during continuous speech perception. We characterize prominent spectral components of speech-brain coupling in auditory cortex and use causal connectivity analysis (transfer entropy) to identify the top-down signals driving this coupling more strongly during intelligible speech than during unintelligible speech. We report three main findings. First, frontal and motor cortices significantly modulate the phase of speech-coupled low-frequency oscillations in auditory cortex, and this effect depends on intelligibility of speech. Second, top-down signals are significantly stronger for left auditory cortex than for right auditory cortex. Third, speech-auditory cortex coupling is enhanced as a function of stronger top-down signals. Together, our results suggest that low-frequency brain oscillations play a role in implementing predictive top-down control during continuous speech perception and that top-down control is largely directed at left auditory cortex. This suggests a close relationship between (left-lateralized) speech production areas and the implementation of top-down control in continuous speech perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels
Bastos, A. M., Vezoli, J., Bosman, C. A., Schoffelen, J.-M., Oostenveld, R., Dowdall, J. R., De Weerd, P., Kennedy, H., & Fries, P. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.018 · Cited by 1,320
Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production
Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Sereno, M. I., & Iacoboni, M. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1263 · Cited by 885
Computational neuroanatomy of speech production
Hickok, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3158 · Cited by 837
Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story
Lerner, Y., Honey, C. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3684-10.2011 · Cited by 834
Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain
Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., & Garrod, S. (2013) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752 · Cited by 643
Self-citationNeural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification
Binder, J. R., Liebenthal, E., Possing, E. T., Medler, D. A., & Ward, B. D. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1198 · Cited by 482
Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception
Sohoglu, E., Peelle, J. E., Carlyon, R. P., & Davis, M. H. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5069-11.2012 · Cited by 388
Top-down and bottom-up processes in speech comprehension
Zekveld, A. A., Heslenfeld, D. J., Festen, J. M., & Schoonhoven, R. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.199 · Cited by 203
Cited by
A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment
Lakatos, P., Gross, J., & Thut, G. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.075 · Cited by 508
Self-citationPredicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 518
Assaneo, M. F., & Poeppel, D. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao3842 · Cited by 164
The Human Neural Alpha Response to Speech is a Proxy of Attentional Control
Wöstmann, M., Lim, S.-J., & Obleser, J. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx074 · Cited by 141
How do listeners time response articulation when answering questions? The role of speech rate.
Corps, R. E., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000759 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, H., Ince, R. A. A., Schyns, P. G., Thut, G., & Gross, J.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1649-1653
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1557828622
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontal Top-Down Signals Increase Coupling of Auditory Low-Frequency Oscillations to Continuous Speech in Human Listeners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.049
- The paper
- Park, H., Ince, R. A. A., Schyns, P. G., Thut, G., & Gross, J. (2015). Frontal Top-Down Signals Increase Coupling of Auditory Low-Frequency Oscillations to Continuous Speech in Human Listeners. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.