Cited by 327Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Reduced GABAergic Action in the Autistic Brain

Open access
Robertson, Caroline E., Ratai, Eva-Maria, Kanwisher, Nancy·2016·Current Biology

Abstract

An imbalance between excitatory/inhibitory neurotransmission has been posited as a central characteristic of the neurobiology of autism [1], inspired in part by the striking prevalence of seizures among individuals with the disorder [2]. Evidence supporting this hypothesis has specifically implicated the signaling pathway of the inhibitory neurotransmitter, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), in this putative imbalance: GABA receptor genes have been associated with autism in linkage and copy number variation studies [3-7], fewer GABA receptor subunits have been observed in the post-mortem tissue of autistic individuals [8, 9], and GABAergic signaling is disrupted across heterogeneous mouse models of autism [10]. Yet, empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis in humans is lacking, leaving a gulf between animal and human studies of the condition. Here, we present a direct link between GABA signaling and autistic perceptual symptomatology. We first demonstrate a robust, replicated autistic deficit in binocular rivalry [11], a basic visual function that is thought to rely on the balance of excitation/inhibition in visual cortex [12-15]. Then, using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we demonstrate a tight linkage between binocular rivalry dynamics in typical participants and both GABA and glutamate levels in the visual cortex. Finally, we show that the link between GABA and binocular rivalry dynamics is completely and specifically absent in autism. These results suggest a disruption in inhibitory signaling in the autistic brain and forge a translational path between animal and human models of the condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, a higher excitatory/inhibitory ratio is thought to contribute to the pathophysiology of various neurological and psychiatric disorders, including ASD.

    “In humans, a higher excitatory/inhibitory ratio is thought to contribute to the pathophysiology of various neurological and psychiatric disorders, including ASD (Nelson & Valakh, 2015;Rubenstein & Merzenich, 2003;Robertson et al., 2016).”

    From Vasopressin regulates social play behavior in sex-specific ways through glutamate modulation in the lateral septum (2025) · cites this paper as Robertson et al., 2016

    The available copy contains the title and reference links, but no substantive passage about excitatory/inhibitory ratios or their role in ASD or other disorders. Searches for excitation–inhibition balance and psychiatric disorders returned no relevant text, so the claim cannot be checked against this copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robertson, C. E., Ratai, E.-M., & Kanwisher, N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
Robertson, Caroline E.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
80-85
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2197168351
Cited by
327
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 17
FWCI
15.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, GABA signaling, excitatory-inhibitory imbalance, binocular rivalry, visual cortex, glutamate, GABAergic inhibition, magnetic resonance spectroscopy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Visual Cortex, Vision, Binocular, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Glutamic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review