The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probability and predictors of transition from first use to dependence on nicotine, alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine: Results of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC)
Open accessAbstract
Background This study aims to estimate general and racial-ethnic specific cumulative probability of developing dependence among nicotine, alcohol, cannabis or cocaine users, and to identify predictors of transition to substance dependence. Methods Analyses were done for the subsample of lifetime nicotine (n=15,918), alcohol (n=28,907), cannabis (n=7,389) or cocaine (n=2,259) users who participated in the first and second wave of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Discrete-time survival analyses were implemented to estimate the cumulative probability of transitioning from use to dependence and to identify predictors of transition to dependence. Results The cumulative probability estimate of transition to dependence was 67.5% for nicotine users, 22.7% for alcohol users, 20.9% for cocaine users, and 8.9% for cannabis users. Half of the cases of dependence on nicotine, alcohol, cannabis and cocaine were observed approximately 27, 13, 5 and 4 years after use onset, respectively. Significant racial-ethnic differences were observed in the probability of transition to dependence across the four substances. Several predictors of dependence were common across the four substances assessed. Conclusions Transition from use to dependence was highest for nicotine users, followed by cocaine, alcohol and cannabis users. Transition to cannabis or cocaine dependence occurred faster than transition to nicotine or alcohol dependence. The existence of common predictors of transition dependence across substances suggests that shared mechanisms are involved. The increased risk of transition to dependence among individuals from minorities or those with psychiatric or dependence comorbidity highlights the importance of promoting outreach and treatment of these populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kessler, R. C. (1997) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160031005 · Cited by 2,085
Kendler, K. S., Prescott, C. A., Myers, J., & Neale, M. C. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.929 · Cited by 1,868
Kessler, R. C., Nelson, C. B., McGonagle, K. A., Edlund, M. J., Frank, R. G., & Leaf, P. J. (1996) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/h0080151 · Cited by 1,378 · cited 2×
“Psychiatric comorbidity predicted transition to dependence, as previously reported (Breslau et al., 2004; Glantz et al., 2008; Kessler, 2004; Kessler et al., 1996; Zimmermann et al., 2003).”
MethodWagner, F. (2002) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(01)00367-0 · Cited by 739
Grant, B. F., Hasin, D. S., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Ruan, W. J., & Pickering, R. P. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v65n0711 · Cited by 724
Self-citationGrant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Ruan, W. J., & Pickering, R. P. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.4.361 · Cited by 644
Self-citationGrant, B. F., Hasin, D. S., Blanco, C., Stinson, F. S., Chou, S. P., Goldstein, R. B., Dawson, D. A., Smith, S., Saha, T. D., & Huang, B. (2005) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v66n1102 · Cited by 601
Self-citationThe epidemiology of dual diagnosis
Kessler, R. C. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.06.034 · Cited by 588 · cited 1×
“N IH -PA Author M anuscript N IH -PA Author M anuscript N IH -PA Author M anuscript Psychiatric comorbidity predicted transition to dependence, as previously reported (Breslau et al., 2004; Glantz et al., 2008; Kessler, 2004; Kessler et al., 1996; Zimmermann et al., 2003).”
MethodRuan, W. J., Goldstein, R. B., Chou, S. P., Smith, S. M., Saha, T. D., Pickering, R. P., Dawson, D. A., Huang, B., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2008) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.06.001 · Cited by 557
Self-citationGrant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Hasin, D. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Ruan, W. J., & Huang, B. (2005) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v66n1001 · Cited by 479 · cited 1×
“AUDADIS-IV methods to diagnose these disorders are described in detail elsewhere (Grant et al., 2005a; Grant et al., 2005b; Grant et al., 2005c; Hasin et al., 2005a; Stinson et al., 2007).”
MethodSelf-citationWagner, F. A. (2002) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/155.10.918 · Cited by 380
Hasin, D., Carpenter, K. M., McCloud, S., Smith, M., & Grant, B. F. (1997) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(97)01332-x · Cited by 369
Self-citationThe Neurobiology of Cocaine Addiction
Nestler, E. (2005) · Science & Practice Perspectives · doi:10.1151/spp05314 · Cited by 367
ZIMMERMANN, P., WITTCHEN, H.-U., HÖFLER, M., PFISTER, H., KESSLER, R. C., & LIEB, R. (2003) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291703008158 · Cited by 366
Wittchen, H.-U., Fröhlich, C., Behrendt, S., Günther, A., Rehm, J., Zimmermann, P., Lieb, R., & Perkonigg, A. (2007) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.12.013 · Cited by 311 · cited 1×
“Therefore, the risk of transitioning to dependence may not be a consequence of early substance use onset per se, but rather of the existence of a concomitant psychiatric and SUD that increase the risk of developing a SUD (Behrendt et al., 2009; Degenhardt et al., 2009; Wittchen et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMarijuana and cannabinoid regulation of brain reward circuits
Lupica, C. R., Riegel, A. C., & Hoffman, A. F. (2004) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705931 · Cited by 289
Psychiatric disorders and stages of smoking
Breslau, N., Novak, S. P., & Kessler, R. C. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00317-2 · Cited by 274
Hatsukami, D. K., Stead, L. F., & Gupta, P. C. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60871-5 · Cited by 227
Drgon, T., D'Addario, C., & Uhl, G. R. (2006) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30349 · Cited by 82
Cited by
Adverse health effects of marijuana use.
Volkow, N. D., Baler, R. D., Compton, W. M., & Weiss, S. R. B. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1402309 · Cited by 2,774
Sex and gender differences in substance use disorders
McHugh, R. K., Votaw, V. R., Sugarman, D. E., & Greenfield, S. F. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.012 · Cited by 1,076
The pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids
Lucas, C. J., Galettis, P., & Schneider, J. (2018) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.13710 · Cited by 724
Compton, W. M., Han, B., Jones, C. M., Blanco, C., & Hughes, A. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30208-5 · Cited by 377
Self-citationLeung, J., Chan, G. C. K., Hides, L., & Hall, W. D. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106479 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez-Quintero, C., Cobos, J. P. D. L., Hasin, D. S., Okuda, M., Wang, S., Grant, B. F., & Blanco, C.
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 120-130
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079140185
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
