Cited by 340Smoking Behavior and CessationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized, controlled pilot trial of a smartphone app for smoking cessation using acceptance and commitment therapy

Open access

Abstract

Background There is a dual need for (1) innovative theory-based smartphone applications for smoking cessation and (2) controlled trials to evaluate their efficacy. Accordingly, this study tested the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary efficacy, and mechanism of behavioral change of an innovative smartphone-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) application for smoking cessation vs. an application following US Clinical Practice Guidelines.Method Adult participants were recruited nationally into the double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial (n=196) that compared smartphone-delivered ACT for smoking cessation application (SmartQuit) with the National Cancer Institute's application for smoking cessation (QuitGuide).Results We recruited 196 participants in two months. SmartQuit participants opened their application an average of 37.2 times, as compared to 15.2 times for QuitGuide participants (p<0001). The overall quit rates were 13% in SmartQuit vs. 8% in QuitGuide (OR=2.7; 95% CI=0.8-10.3). Consistent with ACT's theory of change, among those scoring low (below the median) on acceptance of cravings at baseline (n=88), the quit rates were 15% in SmartQuit vs. 8% in QuitGuide (OR=2.9; 95% CI=0.6-20.7).Conclusions ACT is feasible to deliver by smartphone application and shows higher engagement and promising quit rates compared to an application that follows US Clinical Practice Guidelines. As results were limited by the pilot design (e.g., small sample), a full-scale efficacy trial is now needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.006

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Heffner, J.L., Mull, K., Kientz, J.L., Vilardaga, R., Bricker, J.B. (in review). What is popular is not always right: feature-level analysis of the first acceptance and commitment therapy smartphone application for smoking cessation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Bricker, J. B., Mull, K. E., Kientz, J. A., Vilardaga, R., Mercer, L. D., Akioka, K. J., & Heffner, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bricker, Jonathan B.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
143
Pages
87-94
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089288064
Cited by
340
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 3
FWCI
20.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH082709)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K99DA037276, K23DA026517)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA151251, R01CA166646)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
smoking cessation, acceptance and commitment therapy, mobile application, mobile health, quit rates, app engagement, feasibility and acceptability
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Smoking Cessation, Behavior, Addictive, Treatment Outcome, Cell Phone, Mobile Applications, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review