Cited by 72Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Mindfulness practice moderates the relationship between craving and substance use in a clinical sample

Enkema, Matthew C., Bowen, Sarah·2017·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Relapse following treatment for substance use disorders is highly prevalent, and craving has been shown to be a primary predictor of relapse. Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP) is a psychosocial aftercare program integrating mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral approaches, aimed at reducing the risk and severity of relapse. Results from a recent randomized clinical trial demonstrate enhanced remission resilience for MBRP participants versus both cognitive-behavioral and treatment-as-usual controls. The current study investigated between-session formal and informal mindfulness practice, a hypothesized primary mechanism of action in this treatment, as an attenuating factor in the relationship between craving and substance use. Participants in this secondary analysis were 57 eligible adults who completed either inpatient treatment or intensive outpatient treatment for substance use disorders, were randomized in the parent study to receive MBRP, and completed relevant follow-up assessments. For formal mindfulness practice at post-intervention, both number of days per week and number of minutes per day significantly moderated the relationship between craving at post-intervention and number of substance use days at 6-month follow up. Informal practice did not significantly influence the craving-use relationship in this analysis. These results indicate that increasing formal mindfulness practice may reduce the link between craving and substance use for MBRP participants and enhance remission resiliency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.036

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enkema, M. C., & Bowen, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Pacific University Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Enkema, Matthew C.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
179
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2547541253
Cited by
72
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA025764)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
mindfulness practice, craving, substance use, relapse, mindfulness-based relapse prevention, substance use disorders, moderation
MeSH terms
Humans, Recurrence, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Substance-Related Disorders, Secondary Prevention, Mindfulness, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review